Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183320›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2018

Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Direct Infusion-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Combined Exploratory and Targeted Metabolic Profiling of Human Urine.

Elena Chekmeneva, Gonçalo Dos Santos Correia, María Gómez-Romero, Jeremiah Stamler, Queenie Chan, Paul Elliott, Jeremy K Nicholson, Elaine Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Metabolite Analysis from Protein Deposits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Large-Scale Interlaboratory DI-FT-ICR MS Comparability Study Employing Various Systems.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022
    Article
  9. Sex differences in the human metabolome.Biology of sex differences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elena ChekmenevaDivision of Integrative Systems and Digestive Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1807-2398
Gonçalo Dos Santos CorreiaDivision of Integrative Systems and Digestive Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.
María Gómez-RomeroDivision of Integrative Systems and Digestive Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.
Jeremiah StamlerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine , Northwestern University , Chicago , Illinois 60611 , United States.
Queenie ChanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health , Imperial College London , St. Mary's Campus , London W2 1PG , United Kingdom.
Paul ElliottDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health , Imperial College London , St. Mary's Campus , London W2 1PG , United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-5684
Jeremy K NicholsonDivision of Integrative Systems and Digestive Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.
Elaine HolmesDivision of Integrative Systems and Digestive Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-8389

Funding

INTL POPULATION STUDY ON MACRONUTRIENTS AND BP INTERMAPR01HL050490 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DAVIGLUS, MARTHA L, ELLIOTT, PAUL · 1995 to 2013
$7.3M
Metabolomics-Measured Urinary Metabolites, Diet & BP, 17 Population Samples: INTER01HL084228 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DAVIGLUS, MARTHA L, ELLIOTT, PAUL · 2007 to 2014
$4.2M
Metabolic Pathways Underlying the Contrasting Sodium-BP and DASH/OmniHeart-BP RelationshipsR01HL135486 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DAVIGLUS, MARTHA L, ELLIOTT, PAUL · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL050490NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084228NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of metabolic phenotyping to epidemiological studies involving thousands of biofluid samples presents a challenge for the selection of analytical platforms that meet the requirements of high-throughput precision analysis and cost-effectiveness. Here direct infusion-nanoelectrospray (DI-nESI) was compared with an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) method for metabolic profiling of an exemplary set of 132 human urine samples from a large epidemiological cohort. Both methods were developed and optimized to allow the simultaneous collection of high-resolution urinary metabolic profiles and quantitative data for a selected panel of 35 metabolites. The total run time for measuring the sample set in both polarities by UPLC-HRMS was 5 days compared with 9 h by DI-nESI-HRMS. To compare the classification ability of the two MS methods, we performed exploratory analysis of the full-scan HRMS profiles to detect sex-related differences in biochemical composition. Although metabolite identification is less specific in DI-nESI-HRMS, the significant features responsible for discrimination between sexes were mostly the same in both MS-based platforms. Using the quantitative data, we showed that 10 metabolites have strong correlation (Pearson's r > 0.9 and Passing-Bablok regression slope of 0.8-1.3) and good agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots between UPLC-HRMS and DI-nESI-HRMS and thus can be measured using a cheaper and less sample- and time-consuming method. A further twenty metabolites showed acceptable correlation between the two methods with only five metabolites showing weak correlation (Pearson's  r < 0.4) and poor agreement due to the overestimation of the results by DI-nESI-HRMS.

Indexed as

MetabolomeAdultAlanineChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCreatineCreatinineFemaleHumansHypertensionLactic AcidMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedNanotechnologyReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationAlanineCreatineCreatinineLactic Aciddirect infusion mass spectrometryexploratory analysishigh-throughput analysismetabolic profilingquantitative analysisultra-performance liquid chromatography

Identifiers

PMID30183320
PMCPMC6184476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.