Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30182345›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2019

High Healthcare Resource Use in Hospitalized Patients with a Diagnosis of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 (SMA1): Retrospective Analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID).

Jessica Cardenas, Melissa Menier, Marjet D Heitzer, Douglas M Sproule

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Costs of Illness of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Economic burden of spinal muscular atrophy: an analysis of claims data.Journal of market access & health policy · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica CardenasDepartment of Clinical Development, AveXis, Inc, 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 200, Bannockburn, IL, 60015, USA.
Melissa MenierDepartment of Clinical Development, AveXis, Inc, 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 200, Bannockburn, IL, 60015, USA.
Marjet D HeitzerDepartment of Clinical Development, AveXis, Inc, 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 200, Bannockburn, IL, 60015, USA.
Douglas M SprouleDepartment of Clinical Development, AveXis, Inc, 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 200, Bannockburn, IL, 60015, USA. Dsproule216@avexis.com.
Baxalta (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have high healthcare resource use (HRU) due to respiratory and nutritional complications resulting from progressive muscle atrophy. While previous studies estimate the direct costs to be US$113,000 to US$121,682 per year in the US, they potentially understate costs for type 1 SMA (SMA1). This study analyzed HRU in hospitalizations with a diagnosis of SMA1 and compared it with hospitalizations with complex chronic conditions (CCC) other than SMA1 or those with no CCC.

methodsThis retrospective analysis of a defined subset of the 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) compared a nationally estimated number of hospitalizations of children (aged < 3 years) categorized into three groups: (1) SMA1 (n = 237 admissions), (2) no CCC (n = 632,467 admissions), and (3) other CCC (n = 224,953 admissions).

resultsMean total charges were higher for SMA1 admissions compared with admissions with no CCC (US$150,921 vs US$19,261 per admission, respectively; costs: US$50,190 vs $5862 per admission, respectively; both p < 0.0001). A larger proportion of SMA1 admissions were billed for one or more procedure codes (81.9%) than in the no CCC group (39.4%) or other CCC group (70.1%; both p ≤ 0.0003). SMA1 admissions had a longer length of stay compared with admissions with no CCC (15.1 vs 3.4, respectively; p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThe average total charges for a single SMA1 admission were higher than those of the no CCC group. Because most infants with SMA1 require multiple hospitalizations per year, previous estimates may dramatically underestimate the direct costs associated with HRU. Further studies are required to determine the indirect costs and societal impacts of SMA1.

Identifiers

PMID30182345
PMCPMC6533340
OpenAlexW2766220810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.