ArticleSurgery today2019
BRF2 as a promising indicator for radical lymph-node dissection surgery in patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus.
Article in Surgery today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extent of lymphadenectomy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of three-field versus two-field dissection.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- BDP1 as a biomarker in serous ovarian cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Silencing of BRF2 inhibits the growth and metastasis of lung cancer cells.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRadical lymph-node dissection surgery in patients with cN0 middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We sought a novel biomarker that could be used for decision-making in relation to radical lymph-node dissection.
methodsOne hundred and nineteen patients with cN0 middle thoracic ESCC undergoing three-field lymph-node dissection (3FLND) or two-field lymph-node dissection (Ivor Lewis) esophagectomy were reviewed. A survival analysis, and Chi-square and parametric tests were performed.
resultsA Cox regression analysis revealed that the expression of BRF2 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.014) and progression-free survival (P = 0.014). The survival of patients who underwent 3FLND was better than that of patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the BRF2 overexpression group (P = 0.002), but not in the BRF2 nonoverexpression group (P = 0.386). The risk of lymph-node recurrence and the number of recurrent lymph nodes in patients with the overexpression of BRF2 were increased in the Ivor Lewis group in comparison to the 3FLND group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001). The risk of cervical and superior mediastinal lymph-node recurrence was positively correlated with the overexpression of BRF2 (P = 0.027). Furthermore, in the Ivor Lewis group, a significant correlation was found between the risk of lymph-node recurrence or the number of recurrent lymph nodes and the expression of BRF2 (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004), but not in the 3FLND group (P = 0.193 and P = 0.694).
conclusions3FLND generated better survival outcomes and reduced the rate of lymph-node recurrence in comparison to Ivor Lewis in patients with the overexpression of BRF2. BRF2 can be used as an indicator for radical lymph-node dissection surgery in cN0 ESCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.