Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30182297›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2019

3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence.

Mohammad Samim, Nima Eftekhary, Jonathan M Vigdorchik, Ameer Elbuluk, Roy Davidovitch, Thomas Youm, Soterios Gyftopoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric Hip Arthroscopy: a Review of Indications and Treatment Outcomes.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad SamimDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. mohammad.samim@nyumc.org.
Nima EftekharyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Jonathan M VigdorchikDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Ameer ElbulukDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Roy DavidovitchDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Thomas YoumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Soterios GyftopoulosDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if hip 3D-MR imaging can be used to accurately demonstrate femoral and acetabular morphology in the evaluation of patients with femoroacetabular impingement. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective review at our institution of 17 consecutive patients (19 hips) with suspected femoroacetabular impingement who had both 3D-CT and 3D-MRI performed of the same hip. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed the imaging for the presence and location of cam deformity, anterior-inferior iliac spine variant, lateral center-edge angle, and neck-shaft angle. Findings on 3D-CT were considered the reference standard. The amount of radiation that was spared following introduction of 3D-MRI was also assessed.

resultsAll 17 patients suspected of FAI had evidence for cam deformity on 3D-CT. There was 100% agreement for diagnosis (19 out of 19) and location (19 out of 19) of cam deformity when comparing 3D-MRI with 3D-CT. There were 3 type I and 16 type II anterior-inferior iliac spine variants on 3D-CT imaging with 89.5% (17 out of 19) agreement for the anterior-inferior iliac spine characterization between 3D-MRI and 3D-CT. There was 64.7% agreement when comparing the neck-shaft angle (11 out of 17) and LCEA (11 out of 17) measurements. The use of 3D-MRI spared each patient an average radiation effective dose of 3.09 mSV for a total reduction of 479 mSV over a 4-year period.

conclusion3D-MR imaging can be used to accurately diagnose and quantify the typical osseous pathological condition in femoroacetabular impingement and has the potential to eliminate the need for 3D-CT imaging and its associated radiation exposure, and the cost for this predominantly young group of patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed3D CT3D MRIFemoroacetabular impingement

Identifiers

PMID30182297
OpenAlexW2890742740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.