Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30182183›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2019

Women's knowledge, attitude and practice related to urinary incontinence: systematic review.

Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos, Mariana Luisa Veras Firmiano, Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá, José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto, Dayana Maia Saboia, Leonardo Robson Pereira Sobreira Bezerra

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Validation of the Hungarian version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ).European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Teixeira Moreira VasconcelosFederal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, CEP: 60430-160, Brazil. camilamoreiravasco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-4657
Mariana Luisa Veras FirmianoFederal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, CEP: 60430-160, Brazil.
Mônica Oliveira Batista OriáFederal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, CEP: 60430-160, Brazil.
José Ananias Vasconcelos NetoGeneral Hospital of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Dayana Maia SaboiaFederal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, CEP: 60430-160, Brazil.
Leonardo Robson Pereira Sobreira BezerraFederal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, CEP: 60430-160, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRHospital Geral de Fortaleza · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) investigations lead to an understanding of what a particular population group knows, thinks and does in relation to a certain subject.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted to identify women's KAP related to urinary incontinence (UI) described in the literature and the measurement/evaluation instruments used. A literature search, up to July 2017, was conducted in PUBMED, SCOPUS and BVS (Virtual Health Library) for articles dealing with women's KAP related to UI that described the validation procedure of any data collection instrument. Articles that investigated exclusively male subjects, provider performance or academic teaching strategies were excluded. Relevant studies were analyzed and briefly summarized.

resultsInitially, 799 articles were retrieved. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 remained for reading and summarizing. There has been interest in identifying and evaluating some of the KAP elements related to UI since 1994, with a wide variety of validated instruments used. Knowledge was evaluated in 15 articles and all concluded that there was misinformation about UI in the populations studied. Seven articles studied the intention to seek healthcare for UI, among which only one evidenced an adequate attitude in more than 70% of the participants. All the articles that investigated practice revealed low rates of seeking care.

conclusionsThe KAP elements are influenced by specific questions in each of the studied populations, leading to unique results, which indicates the importance of investigations using standardized data collection instruments that have psychometric validity tested in the target populations.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareUrinary IncontinenceAttitudes and practicesKnowledgeUrinary incontinenceValidated questionnairesWomen

Identifiers

PMID30182183
OpenAlexW2891902179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.