Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30182178›Full record

ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2018

[Primary soft tissue management in open fracture].

F Riechelmann, P Kaiser, R Arora

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Open fractures associated with earthquakes and high-energy trauma: Clinical outcomes and management strategies.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Clinical analysis of accelerated rehabilitation surgery for Gustilo type IIIA/B open tibio fibular fracture.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F RiechelmannUniversitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich. felix.riechelmann@tirol-kliniken.at.
P KaiserUniversitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
R AroraUniversitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDebridement of soft tissue and bone in an open fracture situation to minimize infection risk and achieve primary skin closure, or to provide conditions for early soft tissue coverage. INDICATIONS: Indications are Gustilo-Anderson grade I-III A-C open fractures. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Contraindications are injuries requiring amputation, burns, and life-threatening injuries which make appropriate treatment temporarily impossible. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Removal of gross contamination and macroscopic contaminants; debridement of the wound; complete resection of contaminated and dirty tissue; sparse step-by-step resection of contaminated or non-vital wound and bone margins until vital, bleeding tissue begins; low-pressure irrigation with isotonic irrigation fluid; diagnostic biopsies for microbiological testing; reduction of dead space by interpositioning of muscle or cement spacers loaded with local antibiotics; primary wound closure if tension-free closure possible; otherwise, if resources and knowhow permit and satisfactory clean debridement was achieved, local flap; if flap impossible, debridement not satisfactory, secondary tissue necrosis likely, potential remaining contamination or contamination with fecal matter, then vacuum-assisted closure therapy. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Wound inspection on the second postoperative day, generous indication for second-look surgery after 36-48 h, wound inspection on the second postoperative day, wound inspection every other day, primary antibiotic prophylaxis with a first- or second-generation cephalosporin (e. g., cefuroxime), and adaptation of antibiotic therapy according to susceptibility screening.

resultsInfection rates of 2-4.7% are reported for immediate primary wound closure in Gustilo-Anderson grade I, II, and III A open fractures. For Gustilo-Anderson grade III B, good wound healing, bony consolidation, and no need for secondary surgery was reported in 86.7% when primary wound closure was achieved.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisDebridementFractures, OpenHumansSoft Tissue InjuriesSurgical FlapsSurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementIrrigationLavageWound closureWound infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.