ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2018
Preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions by multidetector CT: What the radiologist needs to know.
Review in European journal of radiology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcatheter Valve Replacement for Mitral Stenosis: A State of the Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography in Structural Heart Interventions: From Preprocedural Planning to Procedural Strategy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Current Status of CT Imaging Before Common Transcatheter Interventions for Structural Heart Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention: Current and Future Role of Multimodality Imaging for Device Selection and Periprocedural Guidance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Computed tomography imaging in preprocedural planning of transcatheter valvular heart interventions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Transcatheter Treatment Options for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Which Device for Which Patients?Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Mitral Annular Calcification: A Review.Heart international · 2023Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography: Application in Valvular Heart Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Dynamic changes of mitral valve annulus geometry at preprocedural CT: relationship with functional classes of regurgitation.European radiology experimental · 2021Article
- Mitral annular disjunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Extent and reproducibility of measurements with computed tomography.European journal of radiology open · 2021Article
- Current Devices in Mitral Valve Replacement and Their Potential Complications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular CT: the role of cardiologists.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitral regurgitation is the most common valve disorder in the Western world, and although surgery is the established therapeutic gold standard, percutaneous transcatheter mitral interventions are gaining acceptance in selected patients who are inoperable or at an exceedingly high surgical risk. For such patients, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide a wealth of valuable morphological and functional information in the preoperative setting. Our aim is to give an overview of the MDCT image acquisition protocols, post-processing techniques, and imaging findings with which radiologists should be familiar to convey all relevant information to the Heart Team for successful treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.