Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181921›Full record

ArticleBone research2018

Biomimetic delivery of signals for bone tissue engineering.

Ming Dang, Laura Saunders, Xufeng Niu, Yubo Fan, Peter X Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Efferocytosis for Bone Regeneration.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming Dang1Macromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Laura Saunders1Macromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Xufeng Niu2Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yubo Fan2Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Peter X Ma1Macromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0191-9487
University of Michigan · USBeihang University · CN

Funding

PTH and Calcium Synergy for Craniofacial RegenerationR01DE022327 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCAULEY, LAURIE K. · 2012 to 2022
$3.8M
Two-stage miRNA delivering scaffolds for patient-originated cells to regenerate blood vesselsR01HL136231 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHEN, YUQING EUGENE · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
A nanoparticle delivery system for CRISPR/Cas9 based therapeuticsR42TR001711 · NCATS · ATGC, INC. · PI KURODA, KENICHI · 2017 to 2019
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS R42 TR001711NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136231NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering is an exciting approach to directly repair bone defects or engineer bone tissue for transplantation. Biomaterials play a pivotal role in providing a template and extracellular environment to support regenerative cells and promote tissue regeneration. A variety of signaling cues have been identified to regulate cellular activity, tissue development, and the healing process. Numerous studies and trials have shown the promise of tissue engineering, but successful translations of bone tissue engineering research into clinical applications have been limited, due in part to a lack of optimal delivery systems for these signals. Biomedical engineers are therefore highly motivated to develop biomimetic drug delivery systems, which benefit from mimicking signaling molecule release or presentation by the native extracellular matrix during development or the natural healing process. Engineered biomimetic drug delivery systems aim to provide control over the location, timing, and release kinetics of the signal molecules according to the drug's physiochemical properties and specific biological mechanisms. This article reviews biomimetic strategies in signaling delivery for bone tissue engineering, with a focus on delivery systems rather than specific molecules. Both fundamental considerations and specific design strategies are discussed with examples of recent research progress, demonstrating the significance and potential of biomimetic delivery systems for bone tissue engineering.

Identifiers

PMID30181921
PMCPMC6115422
OpenAlexW2888847793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.