Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181859›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2018

Identifying and assessing potential harm of medication errors and potentially unsafe medication practices in paediatric hospital settings: a field study.

Rikke Mie Rishoej, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir, Henrik Thybo Christesen, Jesper Hallas, Lene Juel Kjeldsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rikke Mie RishoejClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 19, 2, Odense C, Funen 5000, Denmark.
Anna Birna AlmarsdóttirDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Thybo ChristesenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper HallasDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lene Juel KjeldsenAmgros I/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalized children are prone to experience harm from medication errors (MEs). Strategies to prevent MEs can be developed from identified malfunctioning practices and conditions in the medication use process. In this study, we aimed to identify MEs and potentially unsafe medication practices (PUMPs) in hospitalized children, and to assess the potential harm of these, using raters of different professions.

methodsA 1-week observation using an undisguised technique was conducted on four paediatric hospital wards. One observer followed ward staff during medication prescribing, preparation and administration. MEs and PUMPs were documented using field notes. Three raters including a physician, a nurse and a clinical pharmacist assessed the potential harm of each ME and PUMP using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was analysed using Fleiss' Kappa.

resultsA total of 16 MEs and 809 PUMPs were identified involving a preparation and administration error rate of 8%. No actual harm to patients was observed during the study. Raters assessed the potential harm of 318 unique MEs and PUMPs. Only slight agreement was found (Kappa = 0.26-0.33). A 4-hour delay in the administration of intravenous cefuroxime received the highest harm score. Observations involving no information during prescribing and variations in medication preparation were considered potentially fatal for medications such as digoxin, morphine, enoxaparin and insulin.

conclusionsMEs and potentially unsafe practices and conditions may affect medication safety of hospitalized children. However, observed MEs did not result in any harm. The agreement among raters assessing the potential harm of observations was low. Alternative methods to determine the clinical relevance of errors are needed.

Indexed as

direct observationshospitalized childrenmedication error

Identifiers

PMID30181859
PMCPMC6116774
OpenAlexW2807838472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.