ArticleMobile DNA2018
Insertion sequence elements-mediated structural variations in bacterial genomes.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Independent, ongoing clade-specific expansions of ISMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Elevated rates and biased spectra of mutations in anaerobically cultured lactic acid bacteria.mBio · 2025Article
- Genomic Insights into Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance Transmission and Mitigation Strategies.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Investigation of mobile genetic elements and their association with antibiotic resistance genes in clinical pathogens worldwide.PloS one · 2025Article
- Insertion sequence elements and unique symmetrical genomic regions mediate chromosomal inversions in Streptococcus pyogenes.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Experimental evolution under different nutritional conditions changes the genomic architecture and virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii.Communications biology · 2024Article
- A metagenomics pipeline reveals insertion sequence-driven evolution of the microbiota.Cell host & microbe · 2024Article
- A metagenomics pipeline reveals insertion sequence-driven evolution of the microbiota.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Targeted Screening for Spontaneous Insertion Mutations in a Lactic Acid Bacterium, Tetragenococcus halophilus.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Persistent Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi sub-populations within host interrogated by whole genome sequencing and metagenomics.PloS one · 2023Article
- Insertion sequences and other mobile elements associated with antibiotic resistance genes inMicrobial genomics · 2022Article
- Genomic structural plasticity of rodent-associated Bartonella in nature.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- From a large-scale genomic analysis of insertion sequences to insights into their regulatory roles in prokaryotes.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Toxic/Bioactive Peptide Synthesis Genes Rearranged by Insertion Sequence Elements Among the Bloom-Forming CyanobacteriaFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
- Bacterial Adaptation by a Transposition Burst of an Invading IS Element.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Genome Sequence of M228, a Chinese Isolate of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, Illustrates Insertion Sequence Element Mobility.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) impact the evolution and stability of their host genomes. Insertion sequence (IS) elements are the most common MGEs in bacterial genomes and play a crucial role in mediating large-scale variations in bacterial genomes. It is understood that IS elements and MGEs in general coexist in a dynamical equilibrium with their respective hosts. Current studies indicate that the spontaneous movement of IS elements does not follow a constant rate in different bacterial genomes. However, due to the paucity and sparsity of the data, these observations are yet to be conclusive. In this paper, we conducted a comparative analysis of the IS-mediated genome structural variations in ten mutation accumulation (MA) experiments across eight strains of five bacterial species containing IS elements, including four strains of the E. coli. We used GRASPER algorithm, a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.