ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
Pharmacist and Pediatrician Knowledge of Codeine Use in Children.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Pediatric Pain Management in Nigeria.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- A European multicentre drug utilisation study of the impact of regulatory measures on prescribing of codeine for pain in children.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn 2011, approximately 1.7 million pediatric patients had a codeine-containing prescription filled at a US retail pharmacy. Numerous cases involving serious adverse effects or fatalities have been reported in children who have been prescribed codeine. In 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration added a boxed warning to avoid codeine in children after a tonsillectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine pharmacists' and pediatricians' knowledge of the boxed warning for codeine in children.
methodsTwo separate surveys were administered to community pharmacists in Maryland, pediatricians, and pediatric residents at a single institution in Maryland. Both surveys consisted of questions regarding knowledge of the boxed warning for codeine in children.
resultsThere was no difference in the awareness of the boxed warning between pharmacists (48.9%, n = 43) and pediatricians (51.3%, n = 41, p = 0.88). More pharmacists knew that ultrarapid metabolizers have the risk for increased adverse events from codeine (39.5% pharmacists vs. 20% pediatricians, p = 0.01). In addition, 36% of pharmacists and 33% of pediatricians noted that it was never appropriate to use codeine in a child (p = 0.73).
conclusionsOnly half of pharmacists and pediatricians surveyed were aware of the boxed warning for codeine. One third of pharmacists and pediatricians in this study would never use codeine in a child. Therefore, more education is needed for pharmacists and pediatricians regarding the dangers of using codeine in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.