Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181663›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2018

Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations.

Cindy J Castelle, Christopher T Brown, Karthik Anantharaman, Alexander J Probst, Raven H Huang, Jillian F Banfield

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed, 483 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A host-encoded prophage targets a Candidate Phyla Radiation bacterium and shapes episymbiotic interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cindy J CastelleDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-9804
Christopher T BrownDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-6447
Karthik AnantharamanDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9584-2491
Alexander J ProbstDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-6544
Raven H HuangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Jillian F BanfieldDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. jbanfield@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-8771
Planetary Science Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate phyla radiation (CPR) bacteria and DPANN (an acronym of the names of the first included phyla) archaea are massive radiations of organisms that are widely distributed across Earth's environments, yet we know little about them. Initial indications are that they are consistently distinct from essentially all other bacteria and archaea owing to their small cell and genome sizes, limited metabolic capacities and often episymbiotic associations with other bacteria and archaea. In this Analysis, we investigate their biology and variations in metabolic capacities by analysis of approximately 1,000 genomes reconstructed from several metagenomics-based studies. We find that they are not monolithic in terms of metabolism but rather harbour a diversity of capacities consistent with a range of lifestyles and degrees of dependence on other organisms. Notably, however, certain CPR and DPANN groups seem to have exceedingly minimal biosynthetic capacities, whereas others could potentially be free living. Understanding of these microorganisms is important from the perspective of evolutionary studies and because their interactions with other organisms are likely to shape natural microbiome function.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaAnaerobiosisBacteria, AnaerobicBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCell SizeGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialPhylogenySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30181663
OpenAlexW2892009916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.