Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181595›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Latent variable analysis of negative affect and its contributions to neural responses during shock anticipation.

Namik Kirlic, Robin L Aupperle, Jamie L Rhudy, Masaya Misaki, Rayus Kuplicki, Anne Sutton, Ruben P Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emotional Memory and Amygdala Activation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adolescent alcohol exposure produces sex differences in negative affect-like behavior and group I mGluR BNST plasticity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Namik KirlicLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. nkirlic@laureateinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4153-8774
Robin L AupperleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jamie L RhudyDepartment of Psychology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Masaya MisakiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Anne SuttonLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Ruben P AlvarezLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Funding

Approach-Avoidance Conflict-a multi-level predictor for exposure therapy responseK23MH108707 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI AUPPERLE, ROBIN L · 2016 to 2020
$976k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative affect is considered an important factor in the etiology of depression and anxiety, and is highly related to pain. However, negative affect is not a unitary construct. To identify specific targets for treatment development, we aimed to derive latent variables of negative affect and test their unique contributions to affective processing during anticipation of unpredictable, painful shock. Eighty-three subjects (43 with depression and anxiety spectrum disorders and 40 healthy controls) completed self-report measures of negative valence and underwent neuroimaging while exploring computer-simulated contexts with and without the threat of a painful, but tolerable, shock. Principal component analysis (PCA) extracted distinct components of general negative affect (GNA) and pain-related negative affect (PNA). While elevated GNA and PNA were both indicative of depression and anxiety disorders, greater PNA was more strongly related to task-specific anxious reactivity during shock anticipation. GNA was associated with increased precuneus and middle frontal gyrus activity, whereas PNA was related to increased bilateral anterior insula activity. Anterior insula activity mediated the relationship between PNA and task-specific anxious reactivity. In conclusion, GNA and PNA have distinct neural signatures and uniquely contribute to anxious anticipation. PNA, via insula activity, may relate to arousal in ways that could contribute to affective dysregulation, and thus may be an important treatment target.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingAdolescentAdultAffectAnticipation, PsychologicalAnxiety DisordersCerebral CortexDepressive DisorderFearFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPainYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30181595
PMCPMC6372706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.