ArticleScientific reports2018
Integration of gene interaction information into a reweighted random survival forest approach for accurate survival prediction and survival biomarker discovery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature graphs for interpretable unsupervised tree ensembles: centrality, interaction, and application in disease subtyping.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Evaluation of network-guided random forest for disease gene discovery.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Machine learning algorithms being an auxiliary tool to predict the overall survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma using the SEER database.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- A gradient tree boosting and network propagation derived pan-cancer survival network of the tumor microenvironment.iScience · 2022Article
- Gene biomarker prediction in glioma by integrating scRNA-seq data and gene regulatory network.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- PRER: A patient representation with pairwise relative expression of proteins on biological networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Clinical scoring system for the prediction of survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.ESMO open · 2020Article
- Detecting Cancer Survival Related Gene Markers Based on Rectified Factor Network.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Machine learning approaches to study glioblastoma: A review of the last decade of applications.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting patient risk and identifying survival biomarkers are two important tasks in survival analysis. For the emerging high-throughput gene expression data, random survival forest (RSF) is attracting more and more attention as it not only shows excellent performance on survival prediction problems with high-dimensional variables, but also is capable of identifying important variables according to variable importance automatically calculated within the algorithm. However, RSF still suffers from some problems such as limited predictive accuracy on independent datasets and limited biological interpretation of survival biomarkers. In this study, we integrated gene interaction information into a Reweighted RSF model (RRSF) to improve predictive accuracy and identify biologically meaningful survival markers. We applied RRSF to the prediction of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). With a reconstructed global pathway network and an mRNA-lncRNA co-expression network as the prior gene interaction information, RRSF showed better overall predictive performance than RSF on three GBM and two ESCC datasets. In addition, RRSF identified a two-gene and three-lncRNA signature, which showed robust prognostic values and had high biological relevance to the development of GBM and ESCC, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.