Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Evolution shapes the responsiveness of the D-box enhancer element to light and reactive oxygen species in vertebrates.

Cristina Pagano, Rima Siauciunaite, Maria L Idda, Gennaro Ruggiero, Rosa M Ceinos, Martina Pagano, Elena Frigato, Cristiano Bertolucci, Nicholas S Foulkes, Daniela Vallone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Blind fish have cells that see light.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Immunity, Infection, and the Zebrafish Clock.Infection and immunity · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Cristina PaganoInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Rima SiauciunaiteInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Maria L IddaInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Gennaro RuggieroInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Rosa M CeinosInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Martina PaganoInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Elena FrigatoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Cristiano BertolucciDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0252-3107
Nicholas S FoulkesInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. nicholas.foulkes@kit.edu.
Daniela ValloneInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. daniela.vallone@kit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-7751
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock is a highly conserved cell-autonomous mechanism that directs daily rhythms in most aspects of biology. Daily entrainment by environmental signals, notably light, is essential for its function. However, our understanding of the mechanisms and the evolution of photic entrainment remains incomplete. Fish represent attractive models for exploring how light regulates the circadian clock due to the direct light sensitivity of their peripheral clocks. Central to this property is the light induced expression of clock genes that is mediated by D-box enhancer elements. Here, using zebrafish cells, we reveal that the light responsive D-box enhancer serves as a nuclear target for reactive oxygen species (ROS). We demonstrate that exposure to short wavelengths of visible light triggers increases in ROS levels via NADPH oxidase activity. Elevated ROS activates the JNK and p38 MAP kinases and in turn, induces clock gene expression via the D-box. In blind cavefish and mammals, where peripheral clocks are no longer entrained by direct illumination, ROS levels are still increased upon light exposure. However, in these species ROS no longer induces D-box driven clock gene transcription. Thus, during evolution, alterations in ROS-responsive signal transduction pathways underlie fundamental changes in peripheral clock photoentrainment.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksEnhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedCryptochromesCyprinidaeEye ProteinsFish ProteinsGene Expression RegulationLightNADPH OxidasesPeriod Circadian ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionZebrafishcry1a protein, zebrafishCryptochromesEye ProteinsFish ProteinsNADPH Oxidasesper2 protein, zebrafishPeriod Circadian ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30181539
PMCPMC6123470
OpenAlexW2889220117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.