ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2018
[Characteristics of asthma cases reported as a suspected occupational disease in Navarra. Period 2010-2015].
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough, occupational asthma (OA) causes great work disability, due to its diagnostic complexity, it is difficult to have it recognized by the official registration systems. To improve its detection, suspected systems have been developed. After years of experience in Navarre, we set out to characterize the suspected cases and compare them with those declared as an occupational disease (OD).
methodsWe identified the cases of OA reported as sentinel events in the Epidemiological Surveillance Program in Occupational Health in Navarra from January 2010 to December 2015 and the cases declared as OD (asthma). The population under study was the Navarra employed population (357,200 on average). In the cases with consent, the clinical and labor characteristics were compared with those of OD. Using the SPSS Statistics® 20v computer program, mean differences were calculated by the T test for independent samples and distribution percentage differences by Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and nonparametric tests when application conditions were not satisfied. As an indicator of notification, the accumulated incidence per 100,000 workers was calculated for each year of program monitoring.
resultsIn the period, 79 sentinel events were reported (in 22 the investigation was concluded) and 50 cases of OD (24% relapses). We did not find statistically significant differences in age (41 vs. 40 years), nor gender (40.9% women vs. 44.7%), nor proportion that caused sick leave (45% and 36.8%), nor size, activity of the company or occupation of the worker. Where differences are found was in the meantime of exposure before the recognition/notification, significantly higher in the OD than in the sentinel (94.1 vs. 22.2 months), 72 months longer.
conclusionsThe cases detected by both systems are similar but, due to the diagnostic complexity, the recognition is delayed as OD, which demonstrates the usefulness of a more agile system for reporting suspicions of this work pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30181531PMC11587326W3021652193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.