Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181356›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2019

Empirically Based Guidelines for Selecting Vagus Nerve Stimulation Parameters in Epilepsy and Heart Failure.

Eric D Musselman, Nicole A Pelot, Warren M Grill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric D MusselmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Duke University · US

Funding

Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
NIH HHS OT2 OD025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a promising therapy to treat patients with epilepsy and heart failure. Outcomes of preclinical studies and clinical trials indicate that the selection of stimulation parameters has a direct impact on therapeutic efficacy and patient tolerability, suggesting that both the efficacy and tolerability of VNS could potentially be improved with a change in stimulation parameters. In this review, the success of translating stimulation parameters for epilepsy and heart failure from preclinical studies in animal models to human use in the clinic is evaluated on the basis of patient outcomes and stimulation-induced side effects. Data suggest that patients receiving VNS for epilepsy may experience improved seizure reduction by increasing the frequency and/or duty cycle of stimulation as well as incorporating closed-loop systems to deliver stimulation closer to seizure onset. Further, data suggest that VNS for heart failure is limited by the inability to activate the nerve fibers mediating therapeutic benefit without co-activation of side effect-inducing fibers. This may explain why pivotal trials of VNS for heart failure failed to meet primary efficacy outcomes despite promising preclinical outcomes in animal models. Improved characterization of the relationship between the stimulation parameter space and recruitment of the underlying fiber populations will likely expand the use of VNS to treat a variety of diseases and also improve upon current understanding of the mechanisms of action underlying VNS.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEpilepsyHeart FailureHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30181356
PMCPMC6601452
OpenAlexW2891565870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.