Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181313›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Expenditures on Oncology Drugs and Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio in Central and Eastern Europe.

Eduard Vrdoljak, Gyorgy Bodoky, Jacek Jassem, Razvan Popescu, Robert Pirker, Tanja Čufer, Semir Bešlija, Alexandru Eniu, Vladimir Todorović, Katerina Kopečková and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Procurement of medicines to treat cancer, 2015-2020, China.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Is it too expensive to fight cancer? Analysis of incremental costs and benefits of the Croatian National Plan Against Cancer.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association Between Spending and Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eduard VrdoljakDepartment of Oncology, Clinical Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia edo.vrdoljak@gmail.com.
Gyorgy BodokyDepartment of Oncology, St László Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Jacek JassemMedical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Razvan PopescuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tumor Center Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Robert PirkerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Tanja ČuferUniversity Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Semir BešlijaInstitute of Oncology, Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Alexandru EniuDepartment of Breast Tumors, Cancer Institute "Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta" Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Vladimir TodorovićOncology and Radiotherapy Clinic, Clinical Centre of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Katerina KopečkováDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Galia KurtevaNational Hospital of Oncology, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Zorica TomaševićDaily Chemotherapy Hospital, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Agim SallakuOncology Institute, University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Tirana, Albania.
Snezhana SmichkoskaInstitute University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia.
Žarko BajićBiometrika Healthcare Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Branimir SikicOncology Division, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a steady decline in cancer mortality in Western Europe (WE), but this trend is not so obvious in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). One of the largest discrepancies between WE and CEE is the level of investment in cancer care. The objective of our analysis was to examine the correlation between mortality-to-incidence (M/I) ratio and expenditures on oncology drugs in CEE and WE. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional analysis was done on publicly available data. Data on expenditures for oncology drugs were obtained from QuintilesIMS, and data on M/I ratio from Globocan. The main outcome was mortality-to-incidence ratio, and the primary analysis was performed by Spearman's rank correlation.

resultsThere is a large discrepancy in expenditure on oncology drugs per cancer case between WE and CEE, and within CEE. Average expenditure on oncology drugs per capita as well as per new cancer case was 2.5 times higher in WE than in CEE. Availability of oncology drugs was highest in Germany (100%), relatively similar in WE (average of 91%), but in CEE it ranged from 37% to 86%, with an average of 70%. Annual expenditures on all oncology drugs per new cancer case was significantly negatively correlated with the M/I ratio (Spearman's ρ = -0.90,

conclusionThere is a financial threshold for oncology drugs per cancer case needed to increase survival. Based on significantly lower expenditures for oncology drugs in CEE in comparison with WE, more investment for drugs as well as better, more organized, value- oriented consumption is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cancer is not treated equally successfully in Western Europe (WE) and in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). This study showed that success in treatment of cancer is associated with the amount of money invested in oncology drugs. CEE countries spend on average 2.5 times less than WE countries for oncology drugs per new cancer case. These findings should be used by health care providers and oncologists struggling for more resources and better, more organized, evidence-based allocation of these resources as well as better oncology outcomes.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDrug TherapyEuropeHealth ExpendituresHumansIncidenceNeoplasmsCancerCentral and Eastern EuropeDrug expendituresIncidenceMortalityOncology

Identifiers

PMID30181313
PMCPMC6324644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.