Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30181203›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2018

A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Victoria L Champion, Shannon M Christy, William Rakowski, Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi, Will L Tarver, Lisa Carter-Harris, Andrea A Cohee, Andrew R Marley, Nenette M Jessup, Erika Biederman and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03819920 (Does Knowing One's Estimated Colorectal Cancer Risk Influence Screening Behavior?), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03819920 nacompletednot on this map

Does Knowing One's Estimated Colorectal Cancer Risk Influence Screening Behavior?

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled229ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsRisk Assessment (CCRAT), Usual Care (UC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among females living in the rural Midwest.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Victoria L ChampionIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Vchampio@iu.edu.
Shannon M ChristyDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
William RakowskiBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Wambui G Gathirua-MwangiIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-3688-2466
Will L TarverHSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-7667-5758
Lisa Carter-HarrisIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Andrea A CoheeIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Andrew R MarleyDepartment of Epidemiology, IU Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-5589
Nenette M JessupIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Erika BiedermanIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Carla D KettlerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Timothy E StumpIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Patrick MonahanIndiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
David R LairsonUniversity of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, Houston Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-0527
Susan M RawlIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-2853

Funding

Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Screening Among Rural WomenR01CA196243 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE, PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screnning in WomenR01CA136940 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
Research and Training for Behavioral Oncology InterventionsK05CA175048 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2014 to 2018
$484k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA175048NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136940NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196243NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer mortality could be decreased with risk-appropriate cancer screening. We examined the efficacy of three tailored interventions compared with usual care for increasing screening adherence.

methodsWomen (

resultsThe phone (41.7%,

conclusionsA tailored phone with or without a Web component significantly increased colorectal cancer screening compared with usual care, primarily through stool testing, and phone significantly increased colonoscopy compared with usual care but only among those with the highest levels of baseline fear. IMPACT: This study supports tailored phone counseling with or without a Web program for increasing colorectal cancer screening in average-risk women.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsCounselingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInternetMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTelephone

Identifiers

PMID30181203
PMCPMC7092638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.