Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30180873›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

(1,3)-β-D-glucan-based diagnosis of invasive Candida infection versus culture-based diagnosis in patients with sepsis and with an increased risk of invasive Candida infection (CandiSep): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Frank Bloos, Jürgen Held, Peter Schlattmann, Nicole Brillinger, Oliver Kurzai, Oliver A Cornely, Daniel Thomas-Rüddel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02734550 (), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02734550 nacompletednot on this map

(1,3)-β-D-glucan Based Diagnosis of Invasive Candida Infection Versus Culture Based Diagnosis in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, GermanyRan2016 to 2019Enrolled342ConditionsSevere Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsStandard of care, (1,3)-β-D-glucan guided therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of β-(1→3)-D-glucan, twoJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frank BloosCenter for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. frank.bloos@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-7941
Jürgen HeldMikrobiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinik Erlangen und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Nicole BrillingerCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Oliver KurzaiCenter for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Oliver A CornelyCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Cologne, Germany.
Daniel Thomas-RüddelCenter for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DECologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (DE) 01EO1502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe time to diagnosis of invasive Candida infection (ICI) is often too long to initiate timely antifungal therapy in patients with sepsis. Elevated serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) concentrations have a high diagnostic sensitivity for detecting ICI. However, the clinical significance of elevated BDG concentrations is unclear in critically ill patients. The goal of this study is to investigate whether measurement of BDG in patients with sepsis and a high risk for ICI can be used to decrease the time to empiric antifungal therapy and thus, increase survival. METHODS/

designThis prospective multicenter open randomized controlled trial is being conducted in 19 German intensive care units. All adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and an increased risk for ICI are eligible for enrolment. Risk factors are total parenteral nutrition, previous abdominal surgery, previous antimicrobial therapy, and renal replacement therapy. Patients with proven ICI or those already treated with systemic antifungal substances are excluded. Patients are allocated to a BDG or standard care group. The standard care group receives targeted antifungal therapy as necessary. In the BDG group, BDG serum samples are taken after randomization and 24 h later. Antifungal therapy is initiated if BDG is ≥80 pg/ml in at least one sample. We plan to enroll 312 patients. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Other outcomes include antifungal-free survival within 28 days after enrolment, time to antifungal therapy, and the diagnostic performance of BDG compared to other laboratory tests for early ICI diagnosis. The statistical analysis will be performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Because of the high risk of death, American guidelines recommend empiric antifungal therapy in sepsis patients with a high risk of ICI despite the limited evidence for such a recommendation. In contrast, empiric antifungal therapy is not recommended by European guidelines. BDG may offer a way out of this dilemma since BDG potentially identifies patients in need of early antifungals. However, the evidence for such an approach is inconclusive. This clinical study will generate solid evidence for health-care providers and authors of guidelines for the use of BDG in critically ill patients.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02734550 . Registered 12 April 2016.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesAntifungal Agentsbeta-GlucansBiomarkersCandidaCandidiasis, InvasiveEarly DiagnosisFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProteoglycansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntifungal Agentsbeta-GlucansBiomarkerspolysaccharide-KProteoglycans(1,3)-β-D-glucanBiomarkerEarly antifungal therapyInvasive Candida infectionSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID30180873
PMCPMC6124015
OpenAlexW2890825516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.