Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30180845›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2018

Spousal discordance on reports of contraceptive communication, contraceptive use, and ideal family size in rural India: a cross-sectional study.

Holly B Shakya, Anindita Dasgupta, Mohan Ghule, Madhusudana Battala, Niranjan Saggurti, Balaiah Donta, Saritha Nair, Jay Silverman, Anita Raj

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01593943 (Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural India), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01593943 phase3completednot on this map

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural India

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled2,162ConditionsFamily PlanningArmsCHARM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly B ShakyaDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. hshakya@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-9575
Anindita DasguptaSocial Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mohan GhuleNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai, India.
Madhusudana BattalaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Niranjan SaggurtiBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, India.
Balaiah DontaNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai, India.
Saritha NairNational Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Jay SilvermanDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Anita RajDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of California San Diego · USNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · INColumbia University · USGates Foundation · USNational Institute of Medical Statistics · INPopulation Council Institute · IN

Funding

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural IndiaR01HD061115 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BATTALA, MADHUSUDANA, RAJ, ANITA · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Adolescent fertility and social networks in rural HondurasK01HD087551 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAKYA, HOLLY BAKER · 2016 to 2020
$693k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD087551NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent low rates of spacing contraceptive use among young wives in rural India have been implicated in ongoing negative maternal, infant and child health outcomes throughout the country. Gender inequity has been found to consistently predict low rates of contraception. An issue around contraceptive reporting however is that when reporting on contraceptive use, spouses in rural India often provide discordant reports. While discordant reports of contraceptive use potentially impede promotion of contraceptive use, little research has investigated the predictors of discordant reporting.

methodsUsing data we collected from 867 couples in rural Maharashtra India as part of a men-focused family planning randomized controlled trial. We categorized couples on discordance of men's and women's reports of current contraceptive use, communication with their spouse regarding contraception, and ideal family size, and assessed the levels of discordance for each category. We then ran multinomial regression analyses to determine predictors of discordance categories with a focus on women's empowerment (household and fertility decision-making, women's education, and women's knowledge of contraception).

resultsWhen individuals reported communicating about contraception and their spouses did not, those individuals were also more likely to report using contraception when their spouses did not. Women's empowerment was higher in couples in which both couples reported contraception communication or use or in couples in which only wives reported contraception communication or use. There were couple-level characteristics that predicted husbands reporting either contraception use or contraception communication when their wives did not: husband's education, husband's familiarity with contraception, and number of children.

conclusionsOverall there were clear patterns to differential reporting. Associations with women's empowerment and contraceptive communication and use suggest a strategy of women's empowerment to improve reproductive health. Discordant women-only reports suggest that even when programs interact with empowered women, the inclusion of husbands is essential. Husband-only discordant reports highlight the characteristics of men who may be more receptive to family planning messages than are their wives. Family planning programs may be most effective when working with couples rather than just with women, and should focus on improving communication between couples, and supporting them in achieving concordance in their reproductive preferences.

trial registrationClinical Trials Number: NCT01593943 , registered May 4, 2012 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

CommunicationFamily CharacteristicsPower, PsychologicalAdultContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingEducational StatusFemaleFertilityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRural PopulationContraceptive useFertility preferencesGender inequalityGender normsIndiaSpousal concordance

Identifiers

PMID30180845
PMCPMC6123913
OpenAlexW2891563843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.