Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30180834›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2018

Predicting participation of people with impaired vision in epidemiological studies.

Pedro Lima Ramos, Rui Santana, Laura Hernandez Moreno, Ana Patricia Marques, Cristina Freitas, Amandio Rocha-Sousa, Antonio Filipe Macedo, Portuguese visual impairment study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro Lima RamosLow Vision and Visual Rehabilitation Lab, Department and Center of Physics - Optometry and Vision Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Rui SantanaCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Laura Hernandez MorenoLow Vision and Visual Rehabilitation Lab, Department and Center of Physics - Optometry and Vision Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ana Patricia MarquesCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cristina FreitasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Amandio Rocha-SousaDepartment of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio Filipe MacedoLow Vision and Visual Rehabilitation Lab, Department and Center of Physics - Optometry and Vision Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. a.macedo@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-2010
Portuguese visual impairment study group

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/DPT-EPI/0412/2012Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/119420/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe characteristics of the target group and the design of an epidemiologic study, in particular the recruiting methods, can influence participation. People with vision impairment have unique characteristics because those invited are often elderly and totally or partially dependent on help to complete daily activities such as travelling to study sites. Therefore, participation of people with impaired vision in studies is less predictable than predicting participation for the general population.

methodsParticipants were recruited in the context of a study of prevalence and costs of visual impairment in Portugal (PCVIP-study). Participants were recruited from 4 Portuguese public hospitals. Inclusion criteria were: acuity in the better eye from 0.5 decimal (0.30logMAR) or worse and/or visual field of less than 20 degrees. Recruitment involved sending invitation letters and follow-up phone calls. A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess determinants of participation. The J48 classifier, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were applied to investigate the possible differences between subjects in our sample.

resultsIndividual cases were divided into 3 groups: immediate, late and non-participants. A participation rate of 20% was obtained (15% immediate, 5% late). Factors positively associated with participation included years of education, annual hospital attendance, and intermediate visual acuity. Females and greater distance to the hospital were inversely associated with participation.

conclusionIn our study, a letter followed by a phone call was efficient to recruit a significant number of participants from a larger group of people with impaired vision. However, the improvement in participation observed after the phone call might not be cost-effective. People with low levels of education and women were more difficult to recruit. These findings need to be considered to avoid studies whose results are biased by gender or socio-economic inequalities of their participants. Young subjects and those at intermediate stages of vision impairment, or equivalent conditions, may need more persuasion than other profiles.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesVision DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionPortugalRisk FactorsEpidemiologic studiesRecruitment strategiesStudy designStudy participationVision impairment

Identifiers

PMID30180834
PMCPMC6123934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.