ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
BrownieAligner: accurate alignment of Illumina sequencing data to de Bruijn graphs.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- A survey of sequence-to-graph mapping algorithms in the pangenome era.Genome biology · 2025Review
- Label-guided seed-chain-extend alignment on annotated De Bruijn graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Pan-genome de Bruijn graph using the bidirectional FM-index.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Review
- From the reference human genome to human pangenome: Premise, promise and challenge.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- PuffAligner: a fast, efficient and accurate aligner based on the Pufferfish index.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- The genome of the extremophile Artemia provides insight into strategies to cope with extreme environments.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Pangenome Graphs.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2020Review
- SPAligner: alignment of long diverged molecular sequences to assembly graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Illumina error correction near highly repetitive DNA regions improves de novo genome assembly.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAligning short reads to a reference genome is an important task in many genome analysis pipelines. This task is computationally more complex when the reference genome is provided in the form of a de Bruijn graph instead of a linear sequence string.
resultsWe present a branch and bound alignment algorithm that uses the seed-and-extend paradigm to accurately align short Illumina reads to a graph. Given a seed, the algorithm greedily explores all branches of the tree until the optimal alignment path is found. To reduce the search space we compute upper bounds to the alignment score for each branch and discard the branch if it cannot improve the best solution found so far. Additionally, by using a two-pass alignment strategy and a higher-order Markov model, paths in the de Bruijn graph that do not represent a subsequence in the original reference genome are discarded from the search procedure.
conclusionsBrownieAligner is applied to both synthetic and real datasets. It generally outperforms other state-of-the-art tools in terms of accuracy, while having similar runtime and memory requirements. Our results show that using the higher-order Markov model in BrownieAligner improves the accuracy, while the branch and bound algorithm reduces runtime. BrownieAligner is written in standard C++11 and released under GPL license. BrownieAligner relies on multithreading to take advantage of multi-core/multi-CPU systems. The source code is available at: https://github.com/biointec/browniealigner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.