Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30180692›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018

Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Lei Feng, Andrew J Oxenham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Influence of bilateral cochlear implants on vocal control.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lei FengDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Funding

Supplement for temporal bone histological tissue scanning equipmentR01DC012262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OXENHAM, ANDREW J. · 2013 to 2023
$4.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of a target tone in a simultaneous multi-tone masker can be improved by preceding the stimulus with the masker alone. The mechanisms underlying this auditory enhancement effect may enable the efficient detection of new acoustic events and may help to produce perceptual constancy under varying acoustic conditions. Previous work in cochlear-implant (CI) users has suggested reduced or absent enhancement, due perhaps to poor spatial resolution in the cochlea. This study used a supra-threshold enhancement paradigm that in normal-hearing listeners results in large enhancement effects, exceeding 20 dB. Results from vocoder simulations using normal-hearing listeners showed that near-normal enhancement was observed if the simulated spread of excitation was limited to spectral slopes no shallower than 24 dB/oct. No significant enhancement was observed on average in CI users with their clinical monopolar stimulation strategy. The variability in enhancement between CI users, and between electrodes in a single CI user, could not be explained by the spread of excitation, as estimated from auditory nerve evoked potentials. Enhancement remained small, but did reach statistical significance, under the narrower partial-tripolar stimulation strategy. The results suggest that enhancement may be at least partially restored by improvements in the spatial resolution of current CIs.

Indexed as

Pitch DiscriminationAcousticsAdultCase-Control StudiesCochlear ImplantsCochlear NerveEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearing LossHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30180692
PMCPMC6072550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.