ArticleKorean journal of medical education2018
Developing a core competency model for translational medicine curriculum.
Article in Korean journal of medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessments of Research Competencies for Clinical Investigators: A Systematic Review.Evaluation & the health professions · 2021Pooled it
- When assessment alignment masks generalizability: a methodological cautionary tale from an OBE pilot in nephrology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Physician-Scientist Training System and Development Strategies in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Research on Core Competency Elements of Clinical Investigators.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Overcoming Barriers to Research Competency: a nationwide mixed-method study on residency training in the field of Korean medicine.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2024Article
- Establishing a course to train ICU nurses on prone position mechanical ventilation: A Delphi study.Nursing open · 2024Review
- Areas of strength and opportunities for growth in translational science education and training: Results of a scoping review from the NCATS Education Branch.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop a core competency model for translational medicine curriculum in the Korean graduate education context.
methodsWe invited specialists and key stakeholders to develop a consensus on a core competency model. The working group composed of 17 specialists made an initial draft of a core competency model based on the literature review. The initial draft was sent to the survey group by email to ask whether they agreed or disagreed with each core competency. The working group simplified, merged, or excluded the competencies that received less than 80% agreement among the 43 survey respondents. The working group also reorganized the order of the domains and competencies based on the survey results, and clustered the domains into four major areas.
resultsThe final core competency model has four areas, 12 domains, and 34 core competencies. The major areas are theory-based problem assessment and formulation, study design and measurement, study implementation, and literature review and critique.
conclusionThis new core competency model will provide guidance for the competency based education of translational medicine in Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.