CORR Insights®: Can Machine-learning Techniques Be Used for 5-year Survival Prediction of Patients With Chondrosarcoma?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluation of changes in prediction modelling in biomedicine using systematic reviews.BMC medical research methodology · 2025
   Article
2. How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020
   Article
3. Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Can Machine-learning Techniques Be Used for 5-year Survival Prediction of Patients With Chondrosarcoma?2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as