Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30179654›Full record

ReviewImmunology letters2018

Diversity in the T cell response to Chlamydia-sum are better than one.

Jasmine C Labuda, Stephen J McSorley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CXCR6 marks polyfunctional effector CD4 T cells required for anti-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Pathogenic and Protective Roles of Neutrophils inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmine C LabudaCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States. Electronic address: jclabuda@ucdavis.edu.
Stephen J McSorleyCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Animal Models of Infectious Diseases Training ProgramT32AI060555 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MCSORLEY, STEPHEN J · 2004 to 2025
$3.3M
CD4 T cell responses to Chlamydia infectionR01AI103422 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MCSORLEY, STEPHEN J · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI103422NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is responsible for an increasing number of sexually transmitted infections in the United States and is a common cause of serious pathology in the female reproductive tract (FRT). Given the impact and incidence of these infections, the production of an effective Chlamydia vaccine is a public health priority. Mouse models of Chlamydia infection have been utilized to develop a detailed and mechanistic understanding of protective immunity in the FRT. These studies reveal that MHC class-II restricted Chlamydia-specific CD4 T cells are critical for primary bacterial clearance and provide effective protection against secondary infection in the FRT. Despite the clear importance of IFN- γ produced by CD4 Th1 cells, there are also suggestions of wider functional heterogeneity in the CD4 T cell response to Chlamydia infection. Understanding the role of this diversity in the CD4 T helper cell response in the FRT should allow a more nuanced view of CD4 T cell biology in the context of Chlamydia infection and may be critical for vaccine development. Here, we summarize our current understanding of CD4 T helper subsets in the clearance of Chlamydia and discuss some areas where knowledge needs to be further extended by additional experimentation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisHumansInterferon-gammaTh1 CellsBacterial VaccinesInterferon-gammaCD4 T cellsChlamydiaT helper subsets

Identifiers

PMID30179654
PMCPMC6310219
OpenAlexW2888839196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.