Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30179535›Full record

ReviewInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2018

Sweet flowers are slow, and weeds make haste: leveraging methodology from research on tobacco, alcohol, and opioid analgesics to make rapid and policy-relevant advances in cannabis science.

Evan S Herrmann, Brantley P Jarvis, Alicia C Sparks, Amy M Cohn, Bartosz Koszowski, Zachary R Rosenberry, Victoria H Coleman-Cowger, Wallace B Pickworth, Erica N Peters

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan S Herrmanna Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Brantley P Jarvisa Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Alicia C Sparksa Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Amy M Cohna Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Bartosz Koszowskia Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Zachary R Rosenberrya Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Victoria H Coleman-Cowgera Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Wallace B Pickwortha Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Erica N Petersa Individual and Population Health, Battelle , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Battelle · US

Funding

Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes in Smokers with and without Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA024709 · NIAAA · BATTELLE CENTERS/PUB HLTH RES & EVALUATN · PI PICKWORTH, WALLACE BRUCE · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The legalization of medical and recreational cannabis use has occurred ahead of science. The current evidence base has poor utility for determining if cannabis products can meet the standards of safety, efficacy, and quality intrinsic to modern medicine, and for informing regulation of cannabis as a legal intoxicant. Individual jurisdictions that pass cannabis reforms may not have adequate resources to support the level of new scientific research needed to inform regulatory actions; this could make it difficult to keep a rapidly growing multi-billion-dollar cannabis industry in check. Further, the present lack of evidence-based regulatory oversight for cannabis parallels the climates that gave rise to the tobacco and prescription opioid epidemics, suggesting that continued omission may result in negative public health consequences. However, translating a methodological framework developed through research on these compounds may promote rapid advances in cannabis science germane to regulatory knowledge gaps. The present review highlights specific advancements in these areas, as well as in alcohol regulation, that are prime for informing policy-relevant cannabis science, and also offers some recommendations for evidence-based regulatory policy. Resulting progress may directly inform both regulation of cannabis in both medical and licit recreational drug frameworks, and new cannabis-related public health initiatives.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesAnalgesics, OpioidBiomedical ResearchCannabisLegislation, DrugPublic HealthTobacco ProductsHumansUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidbehaviourCannabislegalizationmedicinepolicy

Identifiers

PMID30179535
PMCPMC6396691
OpenAlexW2889682044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.