Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30179189›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2018

A comparison of absorption and phase contrast for X-ray imaging of biological cells.

Colin Nave

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Damage-limited resolution for X-ray and electron microscopy of organic specimens.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Which resolution?IUCrJ · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin NaveDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, UK.
Diamond Light Source · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray imaging allows biological cells to be examined at a higher resolution than possible with visible light and without some of the preparation difficulties associated with electron microscopy of thick samples. The most used and developed technique is absorption contrast imaging in the water window which exploits the contrast between carbon and oxygen at an energy of around 500 eV. A variety of phase contrast techniques are also being developed. In general these operate at a higher energy, enabling thicker cells to be examined and, in some cases, can be combined with X-ray fluorescence imaging to locate specific metals. The various methods are based on the differences between the complex refractive indices of the cellular components and the surrounding cytosol or nucleosol, the fluids present in the cellular cytoplasm and nucleus. The refractive indices can be calculated from the atomic composition and density of the components. These in turn can be obtained from published measurements using techniques such as chemical analysis, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray imaging at selected energies. As examples, the refractive indices of heterochromatin, inner mitochondrial membranes, the neutral core of lipid droplets, starch granules, cytosol and nucleosol are calculated. The refractive index calculations enable the required doses and fluences to be obtained to provide images with sufficient statistical significance, for X-ray energies between 200 and 4000 eV. The statistical significance (e.g. the Rose criterion) for various requirements is discussed. The calculations reveal why some cellular components are more visible by absorption contrast and why much greater exposure times are required to see some cellular components. A comparison of phase contrast as a function of photon energy with absorption contrast in the water window is provided and it is shown that much higher doses are generally required for the phase contrast measurements. This particularly applies to those components with a high carbon content but with a mass density similar to the surrounding cytosol or nucleosol. The results provide guidance for the most appropriate conditions for X-ray imaging of individual cellular components within cells of various thicknesses.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCytosolHeterochromatinLipidsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastMitochondrial MembranesPhotonsRadiation DosageStarchX-RaysHeterochromatinLipidsStarchbiological cellsdose and fluence requirementsX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID30179189
PMCPMC6140389
OpenAlexW2889160562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.