Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178548›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2018

Determination of hemoglobin mass in humans by measurement of CO uptake during inhalation of a CO-air mixture: a proof of concept study.

Roberto Falz, Martin Busse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A simple and novel equation to estimate the degree of bleeding in haemorrhagic shock: mathematical derivation and preliminaryThe Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto FalzInstitute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Martin BusseInstitute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring hemoglobin mass (Hbmass) using the carbon monoxide (CO) bolus rebreathing method is frequently used in research but has yet to be widely used in the clinical practice. The estimation of an adequate CO bolus may be difficult in patients with unknown Hbmass. In the present pilot study, a progressive inhalation technique for CO that leads to a linear individual adjusted COHb increase was evaluated. Sixteen healthy test subjects participated in the study (preliminary investigation: six; main study: ten). The reliability and validity of the new method were evaluated using multiple measurements of Hbmass with and without a defined blood donation and compared to a CO bolus method. The participants inhaled a CO-air mixture (CO concentration: 1500 ppm) for a specific breathing duration. The CO uptake and COHb change were determined simultaneously. The typical error (reliability) in the repeated measurements was 2.4% (CI ± 4.7). The mean difference between the new method and the bolus method was 34 g (±41; P = 0.026). The measured hemoglobin loss in 490 mL of blood was 74 g (±35), and the calculated hemoglobin loss was 77 g (±4) (mean difference 3 g ± 34; P = 0.820). The new method was reliable and valid in a proof of concept study with healthy subjects. The total amount of CO and as a result the COHb increase is individually adjustable. Future studies in clinical settings are needed to determine if the method could be used in disease-specific pathologies associated with changes in Hbmass.

Indexed as

InhalationAdultBlood VolumeCarbon MonoxideCarboxyhemoglobinFemaleHemoglobinometryHumansMaleOxygenProof of Concept StudySensitivity and SpecificityCarbon MonoxideCarboxyhemoglobinOxygenBlood volumeCOHbCO methodprogressive dosage technique

Identifiers

PMID30178548
PMCPMC6121115
OpenAlexW2891166964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.