ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
A New Bacterial Growth Graph Pattern Analysis to Improve Positive Predictive Value of Continuous Monitoring Blood Culture System.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAST+: pre-positivity application of EUCAST RAST using BACTEC FX growth detection plots - a proof-of-concept study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Performance Evaluation of Continuous Monitoring Blood Culture Systems Using Simulated Septic Specimen.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
False positive signals (FPSs) of continuous monitoring blood culture system (CMBCS) cause delayed reporting time and increased laboratory cost. This study aimed to analyze growth graphs digitally in order to identify specific patterns of FPSs and true positive signals (TPSs) and to find the method for improving positive predictive value (PPV) of FPS and TPS. 606 positive signal samples from the BACTEC FX (BD, USA) CMBCS with more than one hour of monitoring data after positive signal were selected, and were classified into FPS and TPS groups using the subculture results. The pattern of bacterial growth graph was analyzed in two steps: the signal stage recorded using the monitoring data until positive signal and the post-signal stage recorded using one additional hour of monitoring data gained after the positive signal. The growth graph before the positive signal consists of three periods; initial decline period, stable period, and steeping period. Signal stage analyzed initial decline period and stable period, and classified the graphs as standard, increasing, decreasing, irregular, or defective pattern, respectively. Then, all patterns were re-assigned as confirmed or suspicious pattern in the post-signal stage. Standard, increasing, and decreasing patterns with both initial decline period and stable period are typical patterns; irregular patterns lacking a smooth stable period and defective patterns without an initial decline period are false positive patterns. The false positive patterns have 77.2% of PPV for FPS. The confirmed patterns, showing a gradually increasing fluorescence level even after positive signal, have 97.0% of PPV for TPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30178422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.