Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178384›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2018

Gender Disparities in CAD: Women and Ischemic Heart Disease.

Rhian E Davies, Jeremy D Rier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of health awareness on myocardial infarction.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decreased circulating CTRP3 levels in acute and chronic cardiovascular patients.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hypertension in Women: A South-Asian Perspective.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rhian E DaviesDivision of Cardiology, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Jeremy D RierDepartment of Cardiology, WellSpan Cardiology, 755 Norman Drive, Lebanon, PA, 17042, USA. jrier@wellspan.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this article is to review the disparities that exist for women who present for treatment of ischemic heart disease. RECENT

findingsIt is well known that women are more likely to present with ischemic heart disease at an advanced age with more comorbidities when compared to male counterparts. Despite correction of risk factors, women experience worse outcomes, even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. A review of the literature highlights the importance of a thoughtful approach to medical therapy and revascularization. While most recommendations applied to women are derived mostly from male data, further study of sex-specific differences may lead to approaches which can ultimately reduce disparities for the treatment of ischemic heart disease in women.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesClinical Trials as TopicCoronary Artery DiseaseDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleResearch SubjectsRisk FactorsSex FactorsTime-to-TreatmentAcute coronary syndromeGender disparitiesIschemic heart diseaseWomen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.