ArticleLung2018
Association of Radiological Findings with the Xpert MTB/RIF Test in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Article in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021Article
- Diagnostic performance of nucleic acid tests in tuberculous pleurisy.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTuberculosis (TB) treatment is often carried out empirically, based on clinical and radiological findings. Chest X-ray (CXR) has good sensitivity but poor specificity in TB diagnosis. Xpert MTB/RIF (Mycobacterium tuberculosis/Rifampicin) is increasingly used in many countries as the initial diagnostic test for TB. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of radiological findings with the Xpert MTB/RIF test in patients with suspected pulmonary TB.
methodsCross-sectional study in an outpatient TB clinic. Sputum AFB smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CXR were collected in patients with suspected pulmonary TB.
resultsDuring the study period, 312 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Among Xpert MTB/RIF-positive cases, the radiographic patterns were classified as typical of TB, compatible of TB, and normal in 78 (70.3%), 31 (27.9%), and 2 (1.8%) patients, respectively. CXRs were classified as typical of TB, compatible of TB, and normal in 20 (10.0%), 25 (12.4%), and 152 (75.6%) patients, respectively, in Xpert MTB/RIF-negative cases.
conclusionsWe found an association between radiographic patterns and Xpert MTB/RIF results in patients with suspected pulmonary TB. These results confirm the current recommended diagnosis algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.