Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178230›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Variable spectrum of disease and risk factors of peripartum Clostridium difficile infection: report of 14 cases from French hospitals and literature review.

Claire de Curraize, Clotilde Rousseau, Stéphane Corvec, Najoua El-Helali, Vincent Fihman, Frédéric Barbut, Anne Collignon, Alban Le Monnier

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins · 2026
    Article
  2. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. A Case ofInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claire de CurraizeService de Biologie, Unité de Microbiologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France. claire.goulard-de-curraize@u-bourgogne.fr.
Clotilde RousseauLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France.
Stéphane CorvecService de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Najoua El-HelaliService de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Vincent FihmanService de Microbiologie-Hygiène, Unité de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Val de Seine, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Frédéric BarbutCentre National de Référence des Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Anne CollignonEA 4043, Unités Bactéries Pathogènes et Santé, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Alban Le MonnierService de Biologie, Unité de Microbiologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.
Université Paris-Sud · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to study Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in peripartum women in France and compare them to cases published in the literature. We characterize these infections regarding clinico-biological features and specific risk factors in order to raise awareness for obstetricians and midwifes. Eight antepartum and six post-partum CDI cases were retrospectively studied in 6 French centers during the period between 2008 and 2013. In addition, 59 literature cases were reviewed. Cases were identified with CDI clinical symptoms associated to characteristic imagery or detection of C. difficile toxins. The key risk factors of CDI (antibiotherapy, hospitalization) and other risk factors (cesarean section, obstetric complications, corticotherapy, and underlying disease) were retrospectively collected. Most of the cases were exposed to at least one key risk factor of CDI: previous exposure to antibiotics and/or hospitalization. The post-partum cases often had cesarean section: 67% (4/6) in French cases and 89% (31/35) in literature cases. Metronidazole was the most used antibiotic. Relapses occurred in two French cases and in nine published cases. Two French cases and 15 literature cases were reported to have complications (pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, death…). Diverse C. difficile PCR ribotypes were involved, but the BI/NAP1/027 strain was not detected in the French case series contrary to the literature cases. The delay for diagnosis CDI could be long and peripartum CDI could be severe. In case of unexplained diarrhea in pregnant women, clinicians need to consider CDI and ask for research of C. difficile and its toxins in stool.

Indexed as

Peripartum PeriodAnti-Bacterial AgentsCesarean SectionClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFecesFranceHospitalizationHumansMetronidazoleRetrospective StudiesRibotypingRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleClostridium difficile infectionPost-partumPregnancyRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID30178230
OpenAlexW2890414246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.