Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178157›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2018

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lixia Wang, Liang Yao, Peijing Yan, Dongsheng Xie, Caiwen Han, Rong Liu, Kehu Yang, Tiankang Guo, Limin Tian

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lixia WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Liang YaoSchool of Chinses Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Peijing YanInstitution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Dongsheng XieInstitution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Caiwen HanInstitution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Rong LiuThe Second Department of Hepatobiliary surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Kehu YangInstitution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.
Tiankang GuoDepartment of Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. TiankangGuo2018@163.com.
Limin TianDepartment of Endocrinology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. tlm6666@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to summarize the existing evidence to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) and laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) and to determine if these two procedures are equivalent. Literature searches were conducted by a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. The robotic and laparoscopic procedures had no significant differences in hospitalization time, conversion, reoperation, readmission, and postoperative complications. However, RRYGB was associated with a longer mean operative time. RRYGB was not found to be superior to LRYGB. Future studies that would report detailed meaningful postoperative outcomes, such as complications and percentage of excess weight loss, are required to determine any further differences in the efficacy between RRYGB and LRYGB.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayObesity, MorbidOperative TimePatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeWeight LossLaparoscopicMeta-analysisRoboticRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.