Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178081›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2018

A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Teresa Chapman, Adina L Alazraki, Meryle J Eklund

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pregnancy.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa ChapmanDepartment of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Mail Stop MA.07.220, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. teresa.chapman@seattlechildrens.org.
Adina L AlazrakiDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences,Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Meryle J EklundDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Emory University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging examination in evolution. Rapid developments over recent decades have led to better image quality, an increased number of examinations and greater impact on patient care.

objectiveTo gather data regarding current practices among established programs in North America and provide information to radiologists interested in implementing or growing a fetal MRI service. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic survey containing 15 questions relevant to the use of fetal MRI was submitted to pediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists. Items regarded scheduling and reporting logistics, magnet strength, patient positioning and patient preparation. Answers and comments were collected, and descriptive statistics were summarized.

resultsOne hundred and six survey responses were evaluated. Of the survey responses, 62/106 (58.5%) allow fetal MR scheduling any time during the day and 72/105 (68.6%) exclusively use 1.5-T strength platforms for fetal MRI, while only 7/105 (6.7%) use exclusively 3 T. Patient positioning is variable: supine, 40/106 (37.8%); left lateral decubitus, 22/106 (20.8%), and, patient's choice, 43/106 (40.6%). Of the centers responding, 51/104 (49.0%) require no particular fasting instructions, while 20/104 (19.2%) request the patient avoid caffeine before the scanning.

conclusionLogistical trends in performing fetal MRI may supplement the American College of Radiology's published technical standards and offer guidance to radiologists new to the field.

Indexed as

RadiologistsFemaleFetusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNorth AmericaPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesFetusMagnetic resonance imagingPrenatal diagnosisSafety

Identifiers

PMID30178081
OpenAlexW2890255627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.