Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30178032›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine as First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Vaibhav Sahai, Paul J Catalano, Mark M Zalupski, Sam Joseph Lubner, Mark R Menge, Halla Sayed Nimeiri, Hidayatullah G Munshi, Al Bowen Benson, Peter J O'Dwyer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02181634 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-Institutional, Single Arm, Two-Stage Phase II Trial of Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrECOG, LLC.Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled74ConditionsCholangiocarcinomaArmsNab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine
NCT06135896 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Open-label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Tripegfilgrastim Trial to Reduce the Risk of Severe Neutropenia in Patients With Unresectable Pancreaticobiliary Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Center, KoreaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled98ConditionsUnresectable Pancreatic Cancer, Unresectable Bile Duct Carcinoma, Unresectable Biliary Tract CarcinomaArmsTripegfilgrastim
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vaibhav SahaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Paul J CatalanoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark M ZalupskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Sam Joseph LubnerUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison.
Mark R MengeFrauenshuh Cancer Center, Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Halla Sayed NimeiriRobert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Hidayatullah G MunshiRobert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Al Bowen BensonRobert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Peter J O'DwyerAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFrauenshuh Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gemcitabine with platinum has limited efficacy for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, necessitating an evaluation of alternative drug combinations. Recent evidence suggests that paclitaxel may potentiate gemcitabine activity. Objective: To evaluate whether gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is safe and effective for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-arm, 2-stage, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 23 community and academic centers across the United States and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older enrolled between September 2014 and March 2016 had confirmed advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma without prior systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 to 1 and a Child-Pugh score less than 8. Previous surgery, radiation, or liver-directed therapies were permitted. Interventions: Patients received intravenous nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2, followed by gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (null and alternative hypotheses of 55% and 70%, respectively) in the evaluable population. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival (OS), PFS, time to progression, best overall response rate, disease control rate, safety and toxicity, and association of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with survival. Results: Seventy-four patients with a median age of 62 (range, 36-87) years, including 44 women (60%), were enrolled. Patients received a median of 6 (range, 1-18) treatment cycles, and the median follow-up was 10.2 (range, 0.6-27.3) months. The observed 6-month PFS rate of 61% (95% CI, 48%-73%) did not favor the alternative hypothesis. Median PFS was 7.7 (95% CI, 5.4-13.1) months, median OS was 12.4 (95% CI, 9.2-15.9) months, and median time to progression was 7.7 (95% CI, 6.1-13.1) months. The confirmed best overall response rate and disease control rate were 30% and 66%, respectively. Hazard ratios for an association between a change in serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and median PFS as well as median OS were 2.02 (95% CI, 0.86-4.75) (P = .10) and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.64-3.71) (P = .34), respectively. The most common treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events at grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (43%) and fatigue (14%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the trial did not meet its primary efficacy end point, the results indicate that a nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated and may be an alternative option to current therapeutic approaches for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181634.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaDeoxycytidineDisease ProgressionFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle Aged130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID30178032
PMCPMC6440720
OpenAlexW2889296926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.