Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30177703›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Social environment mediates cancer progression in Drosophila.

Erika H Dawson, Tiphaine P M Bailly, Julie Dos Santos, Céline Moreno, Maëlle Devilliers, Brigitte Maroni, Cédric Sueur, Andreu Casali, Beata Ujvari, Frederic Thomas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Ageing effects of social environments in 'non-social' insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  19. Behavior Individuality: A Focus onFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erika H DawsonEvolution, Génomes, Comportement & Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-3575
Tiphaine P M BaillyEvolution, Génomes, Comportement & Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Julie Dos SantosEvolution, Génomes, Comportement & Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Céline MorenoEvolution, Génomes, Comportement & Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Maëlle DevilliersInstitut for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, CEA, UMR 9198, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Brigitte MaroniInstitut for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, CEA, UMR 9198, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Cédric SueurDépartement Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 67037, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-2739
Andreu CasaliInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré (IRBLleida), 25198, Lleida, Spain.
Beata UjvariCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, 3216, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-2988
Frederic ThomasCREEC, MIVEGEC, UMR IRD/CNRS/UM 5290, 34394, Montpellier, France. frederic.thomas2@ird.fr.
Jacques MontagneInstitut for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, CEA, UMR 9198, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Jacques.montagne@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr.
Frederic MeryEvolution, Génomes, Comportement & Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. frederic.mery@egce.cnrs-gif.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of oncogenic phenomena on the ecology and evolution of animal species is becoming an important research topic. Similar to host-pathogen interactions, cancer negatively affects host fitness, which should lead to the selection of host control mechanisms, including behavioral traits that best minimize the proliferation of malignant cells. Social behavior is suggested to influence tumor progression. While the ecological benefits of sociality in gregarious species are widely acknowledged, only limited data are available on the role of the social environment on cancer progression. Here, we exposed adult Drosophila, with colorectal-like tumors, to different social environments. We show how subtle variations in social structure have dramatic effects on the progression of tumor growth. Finally, we reveal that flies can discriminate between individuals at different stages of tumor development and selectively choose their social environment accordingly. Our study demonstrates the reciprocal links between cancer and social interactions and how sociality may impact health and fitness in animals and its potential implications for disease ecology.

Indexed as

DrosophilaSocial EnvironmentAnimalsColorectal NeoplasmsCytoskeletal ProteinsDisease ProgressionDrosophila ProteinsIntestinal NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor ProteinsAPC2 protein, DrosophilaAPC protein, DrosophilaCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30177703
PMCPMC6120865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.