ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Going Green or Going Away? A Spatial Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations, Biased Technological Progress, and Green Total Factor Productivity.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The econometric analysis of voluntary environmental regulations and total factor productivity in agribusiness under digitization.PloS one · 2023Article
- Spatial Effect of Ecological Environmental Factors on Mumps in China during 2014-2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Characterizing Carbon Emissions and the Associations with Socio-Economic Development in Chinese Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Agglomeration of Productive Services, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Based on 68 Prefectural-Level-and-Above Cities in the Yellow River Basin of China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The "Local Neighborhood" Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Regional Differences and Convergence of Inter-Provincial Green Total Factor Productivity in China under Technological Heterogeneity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The positive role of trade openness in industrial green total factor productivity-provincial evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Research on Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity in Yangtze River Delta: From the Perspective of Financial Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Is Technological Progress Selective for Multiple Pollutant Emissions?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Can China's Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Opening the Black Box: The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Technological Innovation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Green Biased Technical Change in Terms of Industrial Water Resources in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Firm Value of Listed Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Relationship between Environmental Information Disclosure and Profitability: A Comparison between Different Disclosure Styles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China's economic development has resulted in significant resource consumption and environmental damage. However, technological progress is important for achieving coordinated economic development and environmental protection. Appropriate environmental regulation policies are also important. Although green total factor productivity, environmental regulations, and technological progress vary by location, few studies have been conducted from a spatial perspective. However, spatial spillover effects should be taken into consideration. This study used energy consumption, the sum of physical capital stock and ecological service value as total capital stock, the number of employed people as inputs, sulfur dioxide emissions as undesired outputs, and green GDP as total output to obtain green TFP through a slacks-based measure (SBM) global Malmquist-Luenberger Index. This study also estimated China's biased technological progress under environmental constraints from 2004 to 2015 based on relevant data (e.g., green GDP, total capital stock, and employment figures). The relationship between green total factor productivity (GTFP), technological progress, and environmental regulation was then examined using a spatial Durbin model. Results were as follows: (1) Based on the complementary elements, although the labor costs gradually increase, the rapid accumulation of capital leads to technological progress that is biased toward capital. However, technological progress in the labor bias can significantly increase GTFP. (2) There is a u-shaped relationship between existing environmental regulations and GTFP. Technological progress can significantly promote GTFP in the surrounding areas through existing environmental regulations. (3) Under spatial weight, the secondary industry coefficient was negative while human capital stock and FDID had positive effects on GTFP. Technological progress is the source of economic growth. It is therefore necessary to promote biased technological development and improve labor-force skills while implementing effective environmental regulation policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.