Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30177514›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2018

Variations in Neonatal Antibiotic Use.

Joseph Schulman, Jochen Profit, Henry C Lee, Grace Dueñas, Mihoko V Bennett, Janella Parucha, Maria A L Jocson, Jeffrey B Gould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 28 NICUs participating in a quality improvement collaborative targeting early-onset sepsis antibiotic use.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Managing antibiotics wisely in a neonatal intensive care unit in a low resource setting.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph SchulmanCalifornia Children's Services, California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California; joseph.schulman@dhcs.ca.gov.
Jochen ProfitPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Henry C LeePerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Grace DueñasPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Mihoko V BennettPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Janella ParuchaCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California.
Maria A L JocsonCalifornia Children's Services, California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California.
Jeffrey B GouldPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Funding

A Dashboard of Racial/Ethnic Disparity in Care Provided by NICUsR01HD083368 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Social Disparities in NICU CareR01HD084667 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083368NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to identify whether and how the NICU antibiotic use rate (AUR), clinical correlates, and practice variation changed between 2013 and 2016 and attempted to identify AUR ranges that are consistent with objectively determined bacterial and/or fungal disease burdens.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study of >54 000 neonates annually at >130 California NICUs from 2013 to 2016, we computed nonparametric linear correlation and compared AURs among years using a 2-sample test of proportions. We stratified by level of NICU care and participation in externally organized stewardship efforts.

resultsBy 2016, the overall AUR declined 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9%-22.0%), reflecting 42 960 fewer antibiotic days. Among NICUs in externally organized antibiotic stewardship efforts, the AUR declined 28.7% (95% CI 28.6%-28.8%) compared with 16.2% (95% CI 16.1%-16.2%) among others. The intermediate NICU AUR range narrowed, but the distribution of values did not shift toward lower values as it did for other levels of care. The 2016 AUR correlated neither with proven infection nor necrotizing enterocolitis. The 2016 regional NICU AUR correlated with surgical volume (ρ = 0.53;

conclusionsUnexplained antibiotic use has declined but continues. Currently measured clinical correlates generally do not help explain AUR values that are above the lowest quartile cutpoint of 14.4%.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCaliforniaCohort StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30177514
PMCPMC6188671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.