Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30177461›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2018

Multicenter study comparing oncologic outcomes between two nodal assessment methods in patients with deeply invasive endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: A sentinel lymph node algorithm versus a comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy.

Brooke A Schlappe, Amy L Weaver, Jennifer A Ducie, Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson, Sean C Dowdy, William A Cliby, Gretchen E Glaser, Robert A Soslow, Kaled M Alektiar, Vicky Makker and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Sentinel lymph node distribution in endometrial cancer: clinical patterns and implications from a 292-patient cohort.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Status of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke A SchlappeGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Amy L WeaverDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer A DucieGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ane Gerda Zahl ErikssonGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sean C DowdyDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
William A ClibyDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gretchen E GlaserGynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert A SoslowDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kaled M AlektiarRadiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vicky MakkerMedical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrea MarianiDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: leitaom@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare oncologic outcomes in the staging of deeply invasive endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) using a sentinel lymph node algorithm (SLN) versus pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy to the renal veins (LND); to compare outcomes in node-negative cases.

methodsAt two institutions, patients with deeply invasive (≥50% myometrial invasion) EEC were identified. One institution used LND (2004-2008), the other SLN (2005-2013). FIGO stage IV cases were excluded. Clinical characteristics and follow-up data were recorded.

results176 patients were identified (LND, 94; SLN, 82). SLN patients were younger (p = 0.003) and had more LVSI (p < 0.001). 9.8% in the SLN and 29.8% in the LND cohorts, respectively, received no adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). There was no association between type of assessment and recurrence; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR; LND vs. SLN) 0.87 (95%CI 0.40, 1.89) PFS. After controlling for age and adjuvant therapy, there was no association between assessment method and OS (aHR 2.54; 95%CI 0.81, 7.91). The node-negative cohort demonstrated no association between survival and assessment method: aHR 0.69 (95%CI 0.23, 2.03) PFS, 0.81 (95%CI 0.16, 4.22) OS. In the node-negative cohort, neither adjuvant EBRT+/-IVRT (HR 1.63; 95%CI 0.18, 14.97) nor adjuvant chemotherapy+/-EBRT+/-IVRT (HR 0.49; 95%CI 0.11, 2.22) were associated with OS, compared to no adjuvant therapy or IVRT-only.

conclusionUse of an SLN algorithm in deeply invasive EEC does not impair oncologic outcomes. Survival is excellent in node-negative cases, irrespective of assessment method. Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative patients does not appear to impact outcome.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessSentinel Lymph NodeDeep invasionEndometrial cancerHigh-riskSentinel lymph node algorithm

Identifiers

PMID30177461
PMCPMC6214768
OpenAlexW2623335465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.