ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Biomembrane Adhesion to Substrates Topographically Patterned with Nanopits.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Curved Lipid Membranes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Effects of Nanopillar Size and Spacing on Mechanical Perturbation and Bactericidal Killing Efficiency.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examine the adhesion of biomembranes to substrates topographically patterned with concave nanopits and identify several universal features in the adhesion process. We find three distinct states, depending on whether the membrane remains flat above the nanopit, partially enters it, or completely adheres to it, and derive analytical conditions for the stability of these states valid for a very general class of nanopit shapes. Surprisingly, completely adhered states are always (meta)stable. We also show that the presence of many nanopits can increase or decrease the effective adhesiveness of a substrate, depending on the tension of the membrane and the strength of the membrane-substrate attraction. Our results have implications regarding several experimental methods, which involve the formation of supported lipid bilayers on substrates patterned with nanopits, as well as observations of decreased spreading of cells and migration of cells toward regions of lower nanopit density on topographically patterned substrates. Furthermore, our predictions can also be directly tested in experiments exploring the adhesion of micropipette-aspirated giant vesicles to such substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.