Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30177240›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of surgery2018

Meet your surgical team: The impact of a resident-led quality improvement project on patient satisfaction.

Rebecca Craig-Schapiro, Sandra R DiBrito, Heidi N Overton, James P Taylor, Ryan B Fransman, Elliott R Haut, Bethany C Sacks

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04850586 (The Impact of Structured Education Given by a Multidisciplinary Team on Pain, Anxiety, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04850586 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Structured Education Given by a Multidisciplinary Team on Pain, Anxiety, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2019 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsPain, Anxiety, Activities of Daily LivingArmsEducation Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca Craig-SchapiroDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: Rcraigs1@jhmi.edu.
Sandra R DiBritoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: dibrito@jhmi.edu.
Heidi N OvertonDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: hoverto1@jhmi.edu.
James P TaylorDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jtayl151@jhmi.edu.
Ryan B FransmanDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: rfransm1@jhmi.edu.
Elliott R HautDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ehaut1@jhmi.edu.
Bethany C SacksDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: bsacks@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Laboratory Research Training for Surgical OncologistsT32CA126607 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMERON, ANDREW M. · 2008 to 2024
$6.0M
Analysis of the impact of missed doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxisR21HL129028 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LAU, BRANDYN DANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$245k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024547NCI NIH HHS T32 CA126607NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL129028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients often have an incomplete understanding of the levels of training and roles of the various surgical providers in teaching hospitals, leading to patient confusion and dissatisfaction.

methodsPre-intervention discharge surveys were administered to gastrointestinal surgery inpatients (10/2016-02/2017) to evaluate sentiments regarding their surgical team. During the intervention period (02/2017-05/2017), patients at admission received "facesheets" containing team member profiles, photos, training level, and roles. These patients were evaluated using the survey, and pre- and post-intervention scores compared.

results153 pre- and 100 post-intervention surveys were collected. There was a significant increase in patients reporting it was important to know the surgical team members and that they knew team member roles (p ≤ 0.05). Scores in every domain of the satisfaction survey improved in the post-intervention period, although not reaching statistical significance.

conclusionsImproving how patients perceive their interactions with their surgical team has implications on patient satisfaction and hospital quality metrics.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresInternship and ResidencyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse-Patient RelationsPatient Care TeamPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsFacesheetPatient satisfactionQuality improvementSurgical team

Identifiers

PMID30177240
PMCPMC6450093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.