ReviewPregnancy hypertension2018
Preeclampsia and the 20th century: "Le siècle des Lumières".
Review in Pregnancy hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathophysiological impact of CXC and CX3CL1 chemokines in preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Preeclampsia: Linking Placental Ischemia with Maternal Endothelial and Vascular Dysfunction.Comprehensive Physiology · 2020Article
- Preeclampsia Is a Syndrome with a Cascade of Pathophysiologic Events.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Increased BMI has a linear association with late-onset preeclampsia: A population-based study.PloS one · 2019Observational
- Historical evolution of ideas on eclampsia/preeclampsia: A proposed optimistic view of preeclampsia.Journal of reproductive immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The authors delineate seven quantum leap forward and, or revolutions having occurred during the 20th century in the understanding of the physiopathology of preeclampsia. First the discovery of the inflatable arm band permitting to measure blood pressure in 1896. Second, the discovery that eclamptic (convulsions), and later "pre"eclamptic (proteinuria) women presented hypertension in 1897 and confirmed in 1903, discovery of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Third, the eight major textbooks published all along the 20th century by delineating risk factors of preeclampsia with the concept of "preeclampsia, disease of primigravidae". Fourth, the discovery in the 1970's that human trophoblast implantation was far deeper than in other mammalian species. Fifth, and a major step forward, description at the end of the 1980's that the maternal syndrome in preeclampsia (glomeruloendotheliosis, HELLP syndrome, eclampsia) could be unified in a global endothelial cell inflammation. Sixth, the epidemiological descriptions in the 1970-1990's that indeed preeclampsia was a disease of first pregnancies at the level of a couple ("primipaternity concept"), leading to an explosion in immunological research in the last decade, beginning in 1998. Seventh and finally, in the search for the "factor X" explaining the vascular inflammation in preeclamptic women (inositol phospho glycans P-type were described in 2000, while soluble Flt-1 and S-endoglins have been clearly predicted since 1997). The majority of the seeds or findings have been grounded or realized in the 20th century. Indeed, for preeclampsia, the 20th century has been le "Siècle des Lumières" (the Enlightments).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.