Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30176951›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

Intranasal octenidine and universal antiseptic bathing reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence in extended care facilities.

A Chow, P Y Hon, G Tin, W Zhang, B F Poh, B Ang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Impact of formulary interventions on the minimum inhibitory concentration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to mupirocin, chlorhexidine, and octenidine in a Singapore tertiary institution.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A ChowDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology,Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-736X
P Y HonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology,Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.
G TinDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology,Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.
W ZhangInfection Control Unit,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.
B F PohInfection Control Unit,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.
B AngDepartment of Infectious Diseases,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intranasal octenidine, an antiseptic alternative to mupirocin, can be used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonisation in the prevention of nosocomial transmission. A controlled before-after study was conducted in three extended-care hospitals in Singapore. All inpatients with >48 h stay were screened for MRSA colonisation in mid-2015(pre-intervention) and mid-2016(post-intervention). Hospital A: universal daily chlorhexidine bathing throughout 2015 and 2016, with intranasal octenidine for MRSA-colonisers in 2016. Hospital B: universal daily octenidine bathing and intranasal octenidine for MRSA-colonisers in 2016. Hospital C: no intervention. In 2015, MRSA prevalence was similar among the hospitals (Hospital A: 38.5%, Hospital B: 48.1%, Hospital C: 43.4%, P = 0.288). From 2015 to 2016, MRSA prevalence reduced by 58% in Hospital A (Adj OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.89) and 43% in Hospital B (Adj OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84), but remained similar in Hospital C (Adj OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.60-2.33), after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, prior MRSA carriage, prior antibiotics exposure and length of hospital stay. Compared with the change in MRSA prevalence from 2015 to 2016 in Hospital C, MRSA prevalence declined substantially in Hospital A (Adj OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.97) and Hospital B (Adj OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-1.03). Topical intranasal octenidine, coupled with universal daily antiseptic bathing, can reduce MRSA colonisation in extended-care facilities.

Indexed as

Skilled Nursing FacilitiesAdministration, IntranasalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBathsCarrier StateChlorhexidineControlled Before-After StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansIminesMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineIminesoctenidinePyridinesExtended care facilityintranasal octenidineMRSA decolonisationuniversal chlorhexidine bathinguniversal octenidine bathing

Identifiers

PMID30176951
PMCPMC6453009
OpenAlexW2892306813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.