Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30176944›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Magnetic resonance imaging and molecular features associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer.

Jia Wu, Xuejie Li, Xiaodong Teng, Daniel L Rubin, Sandy Napel, Bruce L Daniel, Ruijiang Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Association between radiomics features of DCE-MRI and CD8Pathology oncology research : POR · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging.European journal of radiology open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. jiawu@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-8338
Xuejie LiDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaodong TengDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sandy NapelDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Bruce L DanielDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Ruijiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseU01CA190214 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2020
$3.1M
Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersU01CA187947 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Multiregional imaging phenotypes and molecular correlates of aggressive versus indolent breast cancerR01CA222512 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RUIJIANG · 2018 to 2023
$2.4M
MRI-Based Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01CA193730 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RUIJIANG · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of Treatment Response and Prognosis in Breast CancerK99CA218667 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JIA · 2018 to 2019
$322k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA218667NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193730NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222512NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to investigate associations between dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer, as well as to study if MRI features are complementary to molecular markers of TILs.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we extracted 17 computational DCE-MRI features to characterize tumor and parenchyma in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (n = 126). The percentage of stromal TILs was evaluated on H&E-stained histological whole-tumor sections. We first evaluated associations between individual imaging features and TILs. Multiple-hypothesis testing was corrected by the Benjamini-Hochberg method using false discovery rate (FDR). Second, we implemented LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and linear regression nested with tenfold cross-validation to develop an imaging signature for TILs. Next, we built a composite prediction model for TILs by combining imaging signature with molecular features. Finally, we tested the prognostic significance of the TIL model in an independent cohort (I-SPY 1; n = 106).

resultsFour imaging features were significantly associated with TILs (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.2), including tumor volume, cluster shade of signal enhancement ratio (SER), mean SER of tumor-surrounding background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and proportion of BPE. Among molecular and clinicopathological factors, only cytolytic score was correlated with TILs (ρ = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63; P = 1.6E-9). An imaging signature that linearly combines five features showed correlation with TILs (ρ = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.54; P = 4.2E-6). A composite model combining the imaging signature and cytolytic score improved correlation with TILs (ρ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.72; P = 9.7E-15). The composite model successfully distinguished low vs high, intermediate vs high, and low vs intermediate TIL groups, with AUCs of 0.94, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. During validation (I-SPY 1), the predicted TILs from the imaging signature separated patients into two groups with distinct recurrence-free survival (RFS), with log-rank P = 0.042 among triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The composite model further improved stratification of patients with distinct RFS (log-rank P = 0.0008), where TNBC with no/minimal TILs had a worse prognosis.

conclusionsSpecific MRI features of tumor and parenchyma are associated with TILs in breast cancer, and imaging may play an important role in the evaluation of TILs by providing key complementary information in equivocal cases or situations that are prone to sampling bias.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateLinear ModelsLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerCytolytic scoreImaging markerNonsynonymous mutation burdenTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID30176944
PMCPMC6122724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.