Trial reportBMC psychiatry2018
Self-monitoring and personalized feedback based on the experiencing sampling method as a tool to boost depression treatment: a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (ZELF-i).
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- A Longitudinal Study on Predicting Treatment Response in Depression Using Self-Reported Symptoms.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- The association between one's social life and symptoms of prolonged grief following a traumatic loss: an ecological momentary assessment study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Developing a qualitative and quantitative ambulatory assessment-based feedback system within cognitive behavioural interventions for people with persecutory beliefs.Internet interventions · 2025Article
- Towards precision in the diagnostic profiling of patients: leveraging symptom dynamics as a clinical characterisation dimension in the assessment of major depressive disorder.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2024Article
- Usability of the Experience Sampling Method in Specialized Mental Health Care: Pilot Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Practitioner and researcher perspectives on the utility of ecological momentary assessment in mental health care: A survey study.Internet interventions · 2022Article
- Building Emotional Awareness and Mental Health (BEAM): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an App-Based Program for Mothers of Toddlers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Patients' experience of an ecological momentary intervention involving self-monitoring and personalized feedback for depression.Internet interventions · 2021Article
- ESMvis: a tool for visualizing individual Experience Sampling Method (ESM) data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Personalized ESM monitoring and feedback to support psychological treatment for depression: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (Therap-i).BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Using person-specific networks in psychotherapy: challenges, limitations, and how we could use them anyway.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- User Perspectives of Mood-Monitoring Apps Available to Young People: Qualitative Content Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2020Article
- The Association Between App-Administered Depression Assessments and Suicidal Ideation in User Comments: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Redefining Therapeutic Outcomes of Depression Treatment.Journal for person-oriented research · 2019Article
- The Promise of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Improve Depression Management for Older Adults in Primary Care.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a leading cause of disability worldwide. To reduce the societal burden and improve quality of life for individual patients, treatments for depression need to be optimized. There is a particular need for person-tailored interventions that reinforce self-management of patients. Systematic self-monitoring and personalized feedback through the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) could provide such a person-tailored, empowering intervention that enhances treatment outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of self-monitoring and personalized feedback as an add-on tool in the treatment of depressive complaints in a natural setting.
methodsThe ZELF-i study is a pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aim to recruit 150 individuals with depressive symptoms aged between 18 and 65 years, who have an intake for outpatient basic or specialized treatment at a mental health care organization in the North of the Netherlands. After the intake, participants will be randomly allocated to one of three study arms: two experimental groups engaging in 28 days of systematic self-monitoring (5 times per day) and receiving weekly personalized feedback on positive affect and activities ("Do"-module) or on negative affect and thinking patterns ("Think"-module), and a control group receiving no additional intervention. Self-report inventories of depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning and feelings of empowerment will be administered before and after the intervention period, and at follow-up measurements at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. The patient-experienced utility of the intervention will be investigated by a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first to examine the effects of add-on self-monitoring and personalized feedback on depressive complaints in clinical practice. It is also the first to evaluate two different ESM modules targeted at both of depression's core symptoms. Lastly, it is the first study that uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the patient-experienced utility of ESM with personalized feedback as an intervention for depression. Results of the present study may improve treatment for depression, if the intervention is found to be effective.
trial registrationDutch Trial Register, NTR5707 , registered prospectively 1 February 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.