Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30176836›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Evaluation of new flexible and integrative psychiatric treatment models in Germany- assessment and preliminary validation of specific program components.

Jakob Johne, Sebastian von Peter, Julian Schwarz, Jürgen Timm, Martin Heinze, Yuriy Ignatyev

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jakob JohneDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. jakob_johne@yahoo.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8887-0232
Sebastian von PeterBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Julian SchwarzBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen TimmBiometry Section, Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Martin HeinzeBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Yuriy IgnatyevBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlexible and integrative treatment (FIT) models are rather novel in German mental health care. This study aimed at identifying and evaluating empirically based, practicable, and quantifiable program components that describe the specific treatment structures and processes of German FIT models.

methodsA multi-step, iterative research process, based on Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM), was used to identify and operationalise components. A complex algorithm and expert-interviews were applied to quantify the relative weight of each component and to develop a sum score. Face and content validity were examined and internal consistency was tested by Cronbach's α coefficient.

resultsTen of eleven FIT components could be operationalised, quantified and united in the total score. All operationalised components showed sufficient face and content validity and eight components had a good reliability.

conclusionsThe components are a first step in the process of operationally defining German FIT models. They considerably overlap with various critical ingredients of international FIT models and may serve as a theoretical basis for constructing fidelity tools and research guides to enable process and outcome evaluation of German FIT models.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAlgorithmsGermanyHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsPsychotherapyReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesFlexibleHealth services researchIntegrative careMental healthRegional budget

Identifiers

PMID30176836
PMCPMC6122621
OpenAlexW2890091390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.