Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30176802›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Evolution within a language: environmental differences contribute to divergence of dialect groups.

Terhi Honkola, Kalle Ruokolainen, Kaj J J Syrjänen, Unni-Päivä Leino, Ilpo Tammi, Niklas Wahlberg, Outi Vesakoski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence from sperm whale clans of symbolic marking in non-human cultures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Terhi HonkolaDepartment of Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland. terhi.honkola@utu.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-3330-0857
Kalle RuokolainenDepartment of Geography and Geology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kaj J J SyrjänenFaculty of Communication Sciences, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Unni-Päivä LeinoFaculty of Communication Sciences, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Ilpo TammiFaculty of Communication Sciences, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Niklas WahlbergDepartment of Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Outi VesakoskiDepartment of Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Koneen Säätiö 46-13114Koneen Säätiö (FI) 46-13114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe processes leading to the diversity of over 7000 present-day languages have been the subject of scholarly interest for centuries. Several factors have been suggested to contribute to the spatial segregation of speaker populations and the subsequent linguistic divergence. However, their formal testing and the quantification of their relative roles is still missing. We focussed here on the early stages of the linguistic divergence process, that is, the divergence of dialects, with a special focus on the ecological settings of the speaker populations. We adopted conceptual and statistical approaches from biological microevolution and parallelled intra-lingual variation with genetic variation within a species. We modelled the roles of geographical distance, differences in environmental and cultural conditions and in administrative history on linguistic divergence at two different levels: between municipal dialects (cf. in biology, between individuals) and between dialect groups (cf. in biology, between populations).

resultsWe found that geographical distance and administrative history were important in separating municipal dialects. However, environmental and cultural differences contributed markedly to the divergence of dialect groups. In biology, increase in genetic differences between populations together with environmental differences may suggest genetic differentiation of populations through adaptation to the local environment. However, our interpretation of this result is not that language itself adapts to the environment. Instead, it is based on Homo sapiens being affected by its environment, and its capability to adapt culturally to various environmental conditions. The differences in cultural adaptations arising from environmental heterogeneity could have acted as nonphysical barriers and limited the contacts and communication between groups. As a result, linguistic differentiation may emerge over time in those speaker populations which are, at least partially, separated.

conclusionsGiven that the dialects of isolated speaker populations may eventually evolve into different languages, our result suggests that cultural adaptation to local environment and the associated isolation of speaker populations have contributed to the emergence of the global patterns of linguistic diversity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEnvironmentLanguageAdaptation, PhysiologicalCultureFinlandGenetic VariationGeographyHumansLinguisticsModels, TheoreticalCultural adaptationDialect divergenceEnvironmental variationHuman ecologyLinguistic diversityLinguistic microevolutionMultiple regression on distance matricesVariation partitioning

Identifiers

PMID30176802
PMCPMC6122686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.