ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Computer-based automatic classification of trabecular bone pattern can assist radiographic bone quality assessment at dental implant site.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Indications for 3-D diagnostics and navigation in dental implantology with the focus on radiation exposure: a systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2021Pooled it
- Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Human Jawbones: Experiments & FE Analyses.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Automatic Segmentation of the Nasolacrimal Canal: Application of the nnU-Net v2 Model in CBCT Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Detection of pulpal calcifications on bite-wing radiographs using deep learning.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Effect of Splinting on Orthodontic Mini-Implant Tipping and Bone Histomorphometric Parameters: An In Vivo Animal Model Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Construction of a new automatic grading system for jaw bone mineral density level based on deep learning using cone beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Differentiation of osteosarcoma from osteomyelitis using microarchitectural analysis on panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Circumferential bone level and bone remodeling in the posterior mandible of edentulous mandibular overdenture wearers: influence of mandibular bone atrophy in a 3-year cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- The Anatomical Conditions of the Alveolar Process of the Anterior Maxilla in Terms of Immediate Implantation-Radiological Retrospective Case Series Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Jawbone quality classification in dental implant planning and placement studies. A scoping review.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective: To develop and validate an automated classification method that determines the trabecular bone pattern at implant site based on three-dimensional bone morphometric parameters derived from CBCT images.
methods: 25 human cadaver mandibles were scanned using CBCT clinical scanning protocol. Volumes-of-interest comprising only the trabecular bone of the posterior regions were selected and segmented for three-dimensional morphometric parameters calculation. Three experts rated all bone regions into one of the three trabecular pattern classes (sparse, intermediate and dense) to generate a reference classification. Morphometric parameters were used to automatically classify the trabecular pattern with linear discriminant analysis statistical model. The discriminatory power of each morphometric parameter for automatic classification was indicated and the accuracy compared to the reference classification. Repeated-measures analysis of variances were used to statistically compare morphometric indices between the three classes. Finally, the outcome of the automatic classification was evaluated against a subjective classification performed independently by four different observers.
results: The overall correct classification was 83% for quantity-, 86% for structure-related parameters and 84% for the parameters combined. Cross-validation showed a 79% model prediction accuracy. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) had the most discriminatory power in the automatic classification. Trabecular bone patterns could be distinguished based on most morphometric parameters, except for trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and degree of anisotropy (DA). The interobserver agreement between the subjective observers was fair (0.25), while the test-retest agreement was moderate (0.46). In comparison with the reference standard, the overall agreement was moderate (0.44).
conclusion: Automatic classification performed better than subjective classification with a prediction model comprising structure- and quantity-related morphometric parameters. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Computer-aided trabecular bone pattern assessment based on morphometric parameters could assist objectivity in clinical bone quality classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.